» Articles » PMID: 31331372

High-flow Nasal Therapy Versus Noninvasive Ventilation in COPD Patients with Mild-to-moderate Hypercapnic Acute Respiratory Failure: Study Protocol for a Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Background: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is indicated to treat respiratory acidosis due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Recent nonrandomized studies also demonstrated some physiological effects of high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) in COPD patients. We designed a prospective, unblinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to assess the noninferiority of HFNT compared to NIV with respect to the reduction of arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO) in patients with hypercapnic acute respiratory failure with mild-to-moderate respiratory acidosis.

Methods: We will enroll adult patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, as defined by arterial pH between 7.25 and 7.35 and PaCO ≥ 55 mmHg. Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive NIV or HFNT. NIV will be applied through a mask with a dedicated ventilator in pressure support mode. Positive end-expiratory pressure will be set at 3-5 cmHO with inspiratory support to obtain a tidal volume between 6 and 8 ml/kg of ideal body weight. HFNT will be initially set at a temperature of 37 °C and a flow of 60 L/min. At 2 and 6 h we will assess arterial blood gases, vital parameters, respiratory rate, treatment intolerance and failure, need for endotracheal intubation, time spent under mechanical ventilation (both invasive and NIV), intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and hospital mortality. Based on an α error of 5% and a β error of 80%, with a standard deviation for PaCO equal to 15 mmHg and a noninferiority limit of 10 mmHg, we computed a sample size of 56 patients. Considering potential drop-outs and nonparametric analysis, the final computed sample size was 80 patients (40 per group).

Discussion: HFNT is more comfortable than NIV in COPD patients recovering from an episode of exacerbation. If HFNT would not be inferior to NIV, HFNT could be considered as an alternative to NIV to treat COPD patients with mild-to-moderate respiratory acidosis.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03370666 . Registered on December 12, 2017.

Citing Articles

Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation versus High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Updated Narrative Review.

Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu K, He Y, Ding H Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024; 19:2415-2420.

PMID: 39539251 PMC: 11559195. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S487994.


Role of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) in Managing Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Review.

Abualhamael S, Alasmi A, Alqurayqiri A, Alzahrani A, Alsehli A, Althikra A Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67418.

PMID: 39310475 PMC: 11415004. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67418.


Comparison of actual performance in humidification among different high-flow nasal cannula devices: a bench study.

Ni Z, Zhou Y, Tang N, Yu H, Liang Z Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1209977.

PMID: 37359006 PMC: 10288384. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1209977.


Transnasal Aerosol Delivery During High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy.

Saunders J, Davis M Respir Care. 2023; 67(1):149-150.

PMID: 37068118 PMC: 10027127. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.09814.


An Analysis of the Effect of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation on Patients with Respiratory Failure Complicated by Diabetes Mellitus.

Sun J, Wang X, Liu Y, Liu C Dis Markers. 2022; 2022:3597200.

PMID: 36277980 PMC: 9586794. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3597200.


References
1.
Kendrick K, Baxi S, Smith R . Usefulness of the modified 0-10 Borg scale in assessing the degree of dyspnea in patients with COPD and asthma. J Emerg Nurs. 2000; 26(3):216-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0099-1767(00)90093-x. View

2.
Plant P, Owen J, Elliott M . Early use of non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on general respiratory wards: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000; 355(9219):1931-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02323-0. View

3.
Gregoretti C, Confalonieri M, Navalesi P, Squadrone V, Frigerio P, Beltrame F . Evaluation of patient skin breakdown and comfort with a new face mask for non-invasive ventilation: a multi-center study. Intensive Care Med. 2002; 28(3):278-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1208-7. View

4.
Antonelli M, Conti G, Pelosi P, Gregoretti C, Pennisi M, Costa R . New treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: noninvasive pressure support ventilation delivered by helmet--a pilot controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30(3):602-8. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200203000-00019. View

5.
Sessler C, Gosnell M, Grap M, Brophy G, ONeal P, Keane K . The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 166(10):1338-44. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2107138. View