Digital Literacy Linked to Engagement and Psychological Benefits Among Breast Cancer Survivors in Internet-based Peer Support Groups

Overview

Journal Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)

Publisher Wiley

Specialties Nursing
Oncology

Date 2019 Jul 19

PMID 31318132

Citations 12

Authors

Stephen J Lepore

Maria A Rincon

Joanne S Buzaglo

Mitch Golant

Morton A Lieberman

Sarah Bauerle Bass

Suzanne Chambers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Internet-based peer support groups (ISGs) represent an innovative, scalable approach to addressing information and support needs of cancer survivors. However, this innovation may not benefit survivors equally due to population variance in digital literacy. This study examined how digital literacy influences level of engagement in and psychological benefits from participating in ISGs for breast cancer (N = 183).

Methods: Secondary analysis of data from a randomised trial of ISGs that included behavioural measures of engagement, subjective ratings and psychological distress symptoms.

Results: Digital literacy was positively related to education level (p = .005). Relative to women with high digital literacy, those with lower digital literacy were more likely to report difficulties using the ISG and to value the user's guide and facilitator assistance (all p's < .05). Digital literacy was negatively correlated with computer anxiety pre-intervention, distress before and after online chat during the intervention and post-intervention depressive symptoms (all p's < .05).

Conclusion: Low digital literacy is associated with computer anxiety and barriers to ISG use, as well as distress during and after ISG use. Digital literacy must be taken into account when designing or delivering innovative digital interventions for cancer survivors.

Citing Articles

Studying the Digital Intervention Engagement-Mediated Relationship Between Intrapersonal Measures and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Adherence in Sexual and Gender Minority Youth: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Williams M, Manjourides J, Smith L, Rainer C, Hightow-Weidman L, Haley D J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e57619.

PMID: 39804696 PMC: 11773288. DOI: 10.2196/57619.

Empowerment among breast cancer survivors using an online peer support community.

Ruiz-Romeo M, Ciria-Suarez L, Medina J, Serra-Blasco M, Souto-Sampera A, Flix-Valle A Support Care Cancer. 2024; 33(1):56.

PMID: 39730856 PMC: 11680672. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-09119-5.

A systematic review of peer support interventions to improve psychosocial functioning among cancer survivors: can findings be translated to survivors with a rare cancer living rurally?.

Hemming L, Duijts S, Zomerdijk N, Cockburn C, Yuen E, Hardman R Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024; 19(1):473.

PMID: 39707418 PMC: 11662424. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03477-3.

Lessons and Untapped Potential of Smartphone-Based Physical Activity Interventions for Mental Health: Narrative Review.

Bernstein E, Wolfe E, Huguenel B, Wilhelm S JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024; 12:e45860.

PMID: 38488834 PMC: 10981024. DOI: 10.2196/45860.

Designing mHealth Apps to Incorporate Evidence-Based Techniques for Prolonging User Engagement.

Monachelli R, Davis S, Barnard A, Longmire M, Docherty J, Oakley-Girvan I Interact J Med Res. 2024; 13:e51974.

PMID: 38416858 PMC: 11005439. DOI: 10.2196/51974.

References

Hong Y, Pena-Purcell N, Ory M . Outcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 86(3):288-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.014. View

Watkins I, Xie B . eHealth literacy interventions for older adults: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(11):e225. PMC: 4260003. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3318. View

Torre L, Siegel R, Ward E, Jemal A . Global Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends--An Update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015; 25(1):16-27. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0578. View

Norman C, Skinner H . eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Internet Res. 2006; 8(2):e9. PMC: 1550701. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9. View

Eysenbach G . The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004; 53(6):356-71. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.53.6.356. View

Zigmond A, SNAITH R . The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67(6):361-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. View

Welch V, Petkovic J, Pardo J, Rader T, Tugwell P . Interactive social media interventions to promote health equity: an overview of reviews. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016; 36(4):63-75. PMC: 4964231. DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.4.01. View

Lepore S, Buzaglo J, Lieberman M, Golant M, Greener J, Davey A . Comparing standard versus prosocial internet support groups for patients with breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial of the helper therapy principle. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(36):4081-6. PMC: 4265118. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.0093. View

Fang M, Canham S, Battersby L, Sixsmith J, Wada M, Sixsmith A . Exploring Privilege in the Digital Divide: Implications for Theory, Policy, and Practice. Gerontologist. 2018; 59(1):e1-e15. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny037. View

10.

Salovey P, Williams-Piehota P, Mowad L, Moret M, Edlund D, Andersen J . Bridging the digital divide by increasing computer and cancer literacy: community technology centers for head-start parents and families. J Health Commun. 2009; 14(3):228-45. DOI: 10.1080/10810730902805804. View

11.

Davison K, Pennebaker J, Dickerson S . Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. Am Psychol. 2000; 55(2):205-17. View

12.

Golsteijn R, Bolman C, Peels D, Volders E, de Vries H, Lechner L . A Web-Based and Print-Based Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Intervention for Prostate and Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Comparison of User Characteristics and Intervention Use. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(8):e298. PMC: 5587888. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7838. View

13.

McCaughan E, Parahoo K, Hueter I, Northouse L, Bradbury I . Online support groups for women with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 3:CD011652. PMC: 6464660. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011652.pub2. View

14.

Yancey A, Ortega A, Kumanyika S . Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27:1-28. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102113. View

15.

Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S . The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology. 2001; 10(1):19-28. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1611(200101/02)10:1<19::aid-pon501>3.0.co;2-6. View

16.

Tennant B, Stellefson M, Dodd V, Chaney B, Chaney D, Paige S . eHealth literacy and Web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(3):e70. PMC: 4381816. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3992. View

17.

Jacobsen P, Donovan K, Trask P, Fleishman S, Zabora J, Baker F . Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients. Cancer. 2005; 103(7):1494-502. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20940. View

18.

Lepore S, Buzaglo J, Lieberman M, Golant M, Davey A . Standard versus prosocial online support groups for distressed breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2011; 11:379. PMC: 3201039. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-379. View

19.

Horowitz C, Brenner B, Lachapelle S, Amara D, Arniella G . Effective recruitment of minority populations through community-led strategies. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37(6 Suppl 1):S195-200. PMC: 2810631. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.08.006. View

20.

Xie B . Effects of an eHealth literacy intervention for older adults. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(4):e90. PMC: 3222191. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1880. View