» Articles » PMID: 31314646

Between-ear Sound Frequency Disparity Modulates a Brain Stem Biomarker of Binaural Hearing

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2019 Jul 18
PMID 31314646
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The auditory brain stem response (ABR) is an evoked potential that indexes a cascade of neural events elicited by sound. In the present study we evaluated the influence of sound frequency on a derived component of the ABR known as the binaural interaction component (BIC). Specifically, we evaluated the effect of acoustic interaural (between-ear) frequency mismatch on BIC amplitude. Goals were to ) increase basic understanding of sound features that influence this long-studied auditory potential and ) gain insight about the persistence of the BIC with interaural electrode mismatch in human users of bilateral cochlear implants, presently a limitation on the prospective utility of the BIC in audiological settings. Data were collected in an animal model that is audiometrically similar to humans, the chinchilla (; 6 females). Frequency disparities and amplitudes of acoustic stimuli were varied over broad ranges, and associated variation of BIC amplitude was quantified. Subsequently, responses were simulated with the use of established models of the brain stem pathway thought to underlie the BIC. Collectively, the data demonstrate that at high sound intensities (≥85 dB SPL), the acoustically elicited BIC persisted with interaurally disparate stimulation (click frequencies ≥1.5 octaves apart). However, sharper tuning emerged at moderate sound intensities (65 dB SPL), with the largest BIC occurring for stimulus frequencies within ~0.8 octaves, equivalent to ±1 mm in cochlear place. Such responses were consistent with simulated responses of the presumed brain stem generator of the BIC, the lateral superior olive. The data suggest that leveraging focused electrical stimulation strategies could improve BIC-based bilateral cochlear implant fitting outcomes. Traditional hearing tests evaluate each ear independently. Diagnosis and treatment of binaural hearing dysfunction remains a basic challenge for hearing clinicians. We demonstrate in an animal model that the prospective utility of a noninvasive electrophysiological signature of binaural function, the binaural interaction component (BIC), depends strongly on the intensity of auditory stimulation. Data suggest that more informative BIC measurements could be obtained with clinical protocols leveraging stimuli restricted in effective bandwidth.

Citing Articles

Integrate-and-fire-type models of the lateral superior olive.

Ashida G, Wang T, Kretzberg J PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0304832.

PMID: 38900820 PMC: 11189240. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304832.


Rate dependent neural responses of interaural-time-difference cues in fine-structure and envelope.

Hu H, Ewert S, Kollmeier B, Vickers D PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17104.

PMID: 38680894 PMC: 11055513. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17104.


Review of Binaural Processing With Asymmetrical Hearing Outcomes in Patients With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Anderson S, Burg E, Suveg L, Litovsky R Trends Hear. 2024; 28:23312165241229880.

PMID: 38545645 PMC: 10976506. DOI: 10.1177/23312165241229880.


Interaural frequency mismatch jointly modulates neural brainstem binaural interaction and behavioral interaural time difference sensitivity in humans.

Sammeth C, Brown A, Greene N, Tollin D Hear Res. 2023; 437:108839.

PMID: 37429100 PMC: 10529080. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108839.


Aging alters across-hemisphere cortical dynamics during binaural temporal processing.

Eddins A, Ozmeral E, Eddins D Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:1060172.

PMID: 36703999 PMC: 9871896. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1060172.


References
1.
He S, Brown C, Abbas P . Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response. Ear Hear. 2010; 31(4):457-70. PMC: 4193499. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d5d9bf. View

2.
McAlpine D, Haywood N, Undurraga J, Marquardt T . Objective Measures of Neural Processing of Interaural Time Differences. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016; 894:197-205. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_21. View

3.
Nozza R, Wagner E, Crandell M . Binaural release from masking for a speech sound in infants, preschoolers, and adults. J Speech Hear Res. 1988; 31(2):212-8. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3102.212. View

4.
Ruebhausen M, Brozoski T, Bauer C . A comparison of the effects of isoflurane and ketamine anesthesia on auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds in rats. Hear Res. 2012; 287(1-2):25-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.005. View

5.
Stapells D, Oates P . Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol Neurootol. 1997; 2(5):257-80. DOI: 10.1159/000259252. View