» Articles » PMID: 39237547

Automatic Ploidy Prediction and Quality Assessment of Human Blastocysts Using Time-lapse Imaging

Abstract

Assessing fertilized human embryos is crucial for in vitro fertilization, a task being revolutionized by artificial intelligence. Existing models used for embryo quality assessment and ploidy detection could be significantly improved by effectively utilizing time-lapse imaging to identify critical developmental time points for maximizing prediction accuracy. Addressing this, we develop and compare various embryo ploidy status prediction models across distinct embryo development stages. We present BELA, a state-of-the-art ploidy prediction model that surpasses previous image- and video-based models without necessitating input from embryologists. BELA uses multitask learning to predict quality scores that are thereafter used to predict ploidy status. By achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76 for discriminating between euploidy and aneuploidy embryos on the Weill Cornell dataset, BELA matches the performance of models trained on embryologists' manual scores. While not a replacement for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, BELA exemplifies how such models can streamline the embryo evaluation process.

Citing Articles

Non-invasive prediction of human embryonic ploidy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xin X, Wu S, Xu H, Ma Y, Bao N, Gao M EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 77:102897.

PMID: 39513188 PMC: 11541425. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102897.

References
1.
Bardos J, Kwal J, Caswell W, Jahandideh S, Stratton M, Tucker M . Reproductive genetics laboratory may impact euploid blastocyst and live birth rates: a comparison of 4 national laboratories' PGT-A results from vitrified donor oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2022; 119(1):29-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.10.010. View

2.
Greco E, Litwicka K, Minasi M, Cursio E, Greco P, Barillari P . Preimplantation Genetic Testing: Where We Are Today. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(12). PMC: 7352684. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124381. View

3.
Lee C, Su Y, Chen C, Chang T, Kuo E, Zheng W . End-to-end deep learning for recognition of ploidy status using time-lapse videos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 38(7):1655-1663. PMC: 8324635. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02228-8. View

4.
Zhang Y, Chen J, Nabu S, Yeung Q, Li Y, Tan J . The Pregnancy Outcome of Mosaic Embryo Transfer: A Prospective Multicenter Study and Meta-Analysis. Genes (Basel). 2020; 11(9). PMC: 7565393. DOI: 10.3390/genes11090973. View

5.
Rienzi L, Capalbo A, Stoppa M, Romano S, Maggiulli R, Albricci L . No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 30(1):57-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.012. View