» Articles » PMID: 31299079

Functional Interplay Between DEAD-box RNA Helicases Ded1 and Dbp1 in Preinitiation Complex Attachment and Scanning on Structured MRNAs in Vivo

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2019 Jul 13
PMID 31299079
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

RNA structures that impede ribosome binding or subsequent scanning of the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) for the AUG initiation codon reduce translation efficiency. Yeast DEAD-box RNA helicase Ded1 appears to promote translation by resolving 5'-UTR structures, but whether its paralog, Dbp1, performs similar functions is unknown. Furthermore, direct in vivo evidence was lacking that Ded1 or Dbp1 resolves 5'-UTR structures that impede attachment of the 43S preinitiation complex (PIC) or scanning. Here, profiling of translating 80S ribosomes reveals that the translational efficiencies of many more mRNAs are reduced in a ded1-ts dbp1Δ double mutant versus either single mutant, becoming highly dependent on Dbp1 or Ded1 only when the other helicase is impaired. Such 'conditionally hyperdependent' mRNAs contain unusually long 5'-UTRs with heightened propensity for secondary structure and longer transcript lengths. Consistently, overexpressing Dbp1 in ded1 cells improves the translation of many such Ded1-hyperdependent mRNAs. Importantly, Dbp1 mimics Ded1 in conferring greater acceleration of 48S PIC assembly in a purified system on mRNAs harboring structured 5'-UTRs. Profiling 40S initiation complexes in ded1 and dbp1 mutants provides direct evidence that Ded1 and Dbp1 cooperate to stimulate both PIC attachment and scanning on many Ded1/Dbp1-hyperdependent mRNAs in vivo.

Citing Articles

Analyses of translation factors Dbp1 and Ded1 reveal the cellular response to heat stress to be separable from stress granule formation.

Kuwayama N, Powers E, Siketanc M, Sousa C, Reynaud K, Jovanovic M Cell Rep. 2024; 43(12):115059.

PMID: 39675003 PMC: 11759133. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.115059.


The mechanism of mRNA cap recognition.

Gentry R, Ide N, Comunale V, Hartwick E, Kinz-Thompson C, Gonzalez Jr R Nature. 2024; 637(8046):736-743.

PMID: 39663447 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08304-0.


Transcriptome-wide analysis of the function of Ded1 in translation preinitiation complex assembly in a reconstituted in vitro system.

Zhou F, Bocetti J, Hou M, Qin D, Hinnebusch A, Lorsch J Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 38573742 PMC: 10994665. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.93255.


Repression of does not contribute to the synthetic growth defect conferred by an -marked deletion of in a mutant.

Zhang F, Sen N, Hinnebusch A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38410469 PMC: 10896344. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.30.578007.


The mechanism of mRNA activation.

Gentry R, Ide N, Comunale V, Hartwick E, Kinz-Thompson C, Gonzalez Jr R bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 38014128 PMC: 10680758. DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.15.567265.


References
1.
Costello J, Castelli L, Rowe W, Kershaw C, Talavera D, Mohammad-Qureshi S . Global mRNA selection mechanisms for translation initiation. Genome Biol. 2015; 16:10. PMC: 4302535. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0559-z. View

2.
Valasek L, Szamecz B, Hinnebusch A, Nielsen K . In vivo stabilization of preinitiation complexes by formaldehyde cross-linking. Methods Enzymol. 2007; 429:163-83. DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)29008-1. View

3.
Rajagopal V, Park E, Hinnebusch A, Lorsch J . Specific domains in yeast translation initiation factor eIF4G strongly bias RNA unwinding activity of the eIF4F complex toward duplexes with 5'-overhangs. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(24):20301-12. PMC: 3370212. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M112.347278. View

4.
Acker M, Kolitz S, Mitchell S, Nanda J, Lorsch J . Reconstitution of yeast translation initiation. Methods Enzymol. 2007; 430:111-45. DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(07)30006-2. View

5.
Weinberg D, Shah P, Eichhorn S, Hussmann J, Plotkin J, Bartel D . Improved Ribosome-Footprint and mRNA Measurements Provide Insights into Dynamics and Regulation of Yeast Translation. Cell Rep. 2016; 14(7):1787-1799. PMC: 4767672. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.01.043. View