Consciousness As a Concrete Physical Phenomenon
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The typical empirical approach to studying consciousness holds that we can only observe the neural correlates of experiences, not the experiences themselves. In this paper we argue, in contrast, that experiences are concrete physical phenomena that can causally interact with other phenomena, including observers. Hence, experiences can be observed and scientifically modelled. We propose that the epistemic gap between an experience and a scientific model of its neural mechanisms stems from the fact that the model is merely a theoretical construct based on observations, and distinct from the concrete phenomenon it models, namely the experience itself. In this sense, there is a gap between any natural phenomenon and its scientific model. On this approach, a neuroscientific theory of the constitutive mechanisms of an experience is literally a model of the subjective experience itself. We argue that this metatheoretical framework provides a solid basis for the empirical study of consciousness.
Naturalism and the hard problem of mysticism in psychedelic science.
Jylkka J Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1112103.
PMID: 38558777 PMC: 10979935. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1112103.
The Constrained Disorder Principle May Account for Consciousness.
Sigawi T, Hamtzany O, Shakargy J, Ilan Y Brain Sci. 2024; 14(3).
PMID: 38539598 PMC: 10968910. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14030209.
On the origins and evolution of qualia: An experience-space perspective.
Lacalli T Front Syst Neurosci. 2022; 16:945722.
PMID: 36032325 PMC: 9399462. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.945722.
Jylkka J ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2021; 4(4):1468-1470.
PMID: 34423278 PMC: 8369668. DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.1c00137.
Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap.
Feinberg T, Mallatt J Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1041.
PMID: 32595555 PMC: 7304239. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01041.