» Articles » PMID: 31285882

Potency of Antipseudomonal β-lactams Against Blood and Respiratory Isolates of Collected from US Hospitals

Overview
Journal J Thorac Dis
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2019 Jul 10
PMID 31285882
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Challenges due to multidrug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial pathogens such as (PSA) are increasing globally. Suboptimal antimicrobial therapy of infections caused by PSA is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. As a result, antimicrobial susceptibility (%S) studies are pivotal to identifying trends in antimicrobial resistance that inform decisions regarding choice of antimicrobial therapy. This study assessed the potency of 7 antipseudomonal agents including ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) against PSA collected from numerous sites across the US.

Methods: Multiple US hospitals provided non-duplicate respiratory and blood isolates of PSA for potency testing. MICs against PSA were determined using broth microdilution methods according to CLSI for 7 antimicrobials with antipseudomonal activity: aztreonam (ATM), cefepime (FEP), ceftazidime (CAZ), C/T, imipenem (IPM), meropenem (MEM) and piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP). %S was defined per CLSI or FDA breakpoint criteria.

Results: Thirty-five hospitals geographically spread across the US provided a total of 1,209 PSA isolates. Of the antibiotics assessed, %S to C/T was the highest at 95% with an MIC of 0.5 mg/L and MIC of 2 mg/L. In comparison, other %S (MIC/MIC) was as follows: ATM 66% (8/32); FEP 76% (4/32); CAZ 78% (4/64); IPM 68% (2/16); MEM 74% (0.5/16); and TZP 73% (8/128).

Conclusions: For this geographically diverse PSA population, C/T demonstrated the highest overall susceptibility (95%). Other antipseudomonal agents inclusive of the carbapenems displayed susceptibilities of 66-78%. In the era of escalating PSA resistance to the β-lactams, the potency of C/T may represent an important clinical option.

Citing Articles

Changing Genotypic Distribution, Antimicrobial Susceptibilities, and Risk Factors of Urinary Tract Infection Caused by Carbapenemase-Producing .

Jeong S, Jeon K, Lee N, Park M, Song W Ann Lab Med. 2023; 44(1):38-46.

PMID: 37665284 PMC: 10485864. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2024.44.1.38.


Endemic High-Risk Clone ST277 Is Related to the Spread of SPM-1-Producing during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period in Northern Brazil.

Dos Santos P, Rodrigues Y, Marcon D, Lobato A, Cazuza T, Gouveia M Microorganisms. 2023; 11(8).

PMID: 37630629 PMC: 10457858. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11082069.


Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Bloodstream Infection with Carbapenem-Resistant in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.

Yuan F, Xiao W, Wang X, Fu Y, Wei X Infect Drug Resist. 2023; 16:4943-4952.

PMID: 37546370 PMC: 10402715. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S419064.


Case Commentary: When Voldemort Meets Sauron: Treatment Considerations for Emerging Dual-Carbapenemase-Producing Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Wangchinda W, Pogue J Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023; 67(7):e0047523.

PMID: 37310216 PMC: 10353471. DOI: 10.1128/aac.00475-23.


Carbapenemase-producing -an emerging challenge.

Tenover F, Nicolau D, Gill C Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022; 11(1):811-814.

PMID: 35240944 PMC: 8920394. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2048972.


References
1.
Boyd N, Nailor M . Combination antibiotic therapy for empiric and definitive treatment of gram-negative infections: insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy. 2011; 31(11):1073-84. DOI: 10.1592/phco.31.11.1073. View

2.
Eagye K, Banevicius M, Nicolau D . Pseudomonas aeruginosa is not just in the intensive care unit any more: implications for empirical therapy. Crit Care Med. 2012; 40(4):1329-32. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc8d0. View

3.
Sievert D, Ricks P, Edwards J, Schneider A, Patel J, Srinivasan A . Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009-2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012; 34(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1086/668770. View

4.
Sutherland C, Nicolau D . Susceptibility Profile of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam and Other Parenteral Antimicrobials Against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa From US Hospitals. Clin Ther. 2015; 37(7):1564-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.05.501. View

5.
Pfaller M, Bassetti M, Duncan L, Castanheira M . Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity against drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing urinary tract and intraabdominal infections in Europe: report from an antimicrobial surveillance programme (2012-15). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017; 72(5):1386-1395. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx009. View