» Articles » PMID: 28165526

Ceftolozane/tazobactam Activity Against Drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Causing Urinary Tract and Intraabdominal Infections in Europe: Report from an Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (2012-15)

Overview
Date 2017 Feb 7
PMID 28165526
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparators tested against European isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from hospitalized patients with urinary tract infection or intraabdominal infections.

Methods: A total of 6553 Gram-negative organisms (603 P. aeruginosa and 5950 Enterobacteriaceae) were consecutively collected from 41 hospitals located in 17 European countries plus Israel and Turkey. The organisms were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods and the results interpreted according to EUCAST and CLSI breakpoint criteria.

Results: Ceftolozane/tazobactam [MIC 50/90 0.25/1 mg/L; 93.5%/91.3% susceptible (S) (CLSI/EUCAST criteria)] and meropenem [MIC 50/90  ≤0.06/≤0.06 mg/L; 98.1%/98.3% S (CLSI/EUCAST)] were the most active compounds tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 1.9% were carbapenem resistant (CRE), 15.2% exhibited an ESBL non-CRE phenotype, 14.6% were MDR, 2.2% were XDR and <0.1% were pan-drug resistant (PDR). Whereas ceftolozane/tazobactam showed activity against ESBL non-CRE phenotype isolates (MIC 50/90 0.5/8 mg/L), it lacked useful activity against strains with a CRE (MIC 50/90  >32/>32 mg/L; 3.6% S) or PDR (MIC 50  >32 mg/L; 0.0% S) phenotype. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most potent (MIC 50/90 0.5/4 mg/L) β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa isolates, inhibiting 91.7% at an MIC of ≤4 mg/L. P. aeruginosa exhibited high rates of resistance to cefepime (20.6%), ceftazidime (23.1%), meropenem (9.0%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (26.9%) (EUCAST criteria). Among these four P. aeruginosa resistant phenotypes, 61.3%-70.4% were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam.

Conclusions: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active β-lactam agent tested against P. aeruginosa and demonstrated higher in vitro activity than currently available cephalosporins and piperacillin/tazobactam when tested against Enterobacteriaceae.

Citing Articles

Ceftolozane/tazobactam: Literature review of its activity on Taiwanese isolates before its launch in Taiwan (2012-2021).

Chao C, Yu W Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e33114.

PMID: 39040254 PMC: 11260915. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33114.


Global evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against ESBLs-producing and : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Khorasani M, Rostami S, Bakhshi A, Sheikhi R Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2023; 10:20499361231212074.

PMID: 38029068 PMC: 10656798. DOI: 10.1177/20499361231212074.


Exploring the views of infection consultants in England on a novel delinked funding model for antimicrobials: the SMASH study.

Baltas I, Gilchrist M, Koutoumanou E, Gibani M, Meiring J, Otu A JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023; 5(4):dlad091.

PMID: 37533762 PMC: 10391702. DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad091.


Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients.

Barbier F, Hraiech S, Kerneis S, Veluppillai N, Pajot O, Poissy J Ann Intensive Care. 2023; 13(1):65.

PMID: 37462830 PMC: 10354316. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-023-01153-6.


Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Pharmacokinetics in the Abdominal Tissue of Patients Undergoing Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery: Dosing Considerations Based on Site-Specific Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment.

Yoshimura K, Ohge H, Ikawa K, Uegami S, Watadani Y, Shigemoto N Infect Dis Ther. 2022; 12(1):193-207.

PMID: 36418742 PMC: 9868209. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00720-x.