» Articles » PMID: 31275942

Radiological Imaging Evaluation of the Failing Total Hip Replacement

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2019 Jul 6
PMID 31275942
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Total hip replacements (THR) have been performed in the UK from the 1960s and since then we have seen surgical techniques, the design of implants, and imaging modalities rapidly develop. This paper will aim to review the different complications and imaging appearance which help to evaluate each problem. As for all investigations for bone and joints, a radiograph is the first imaging to be performed for any patient with a THR and can detect a majority of complications. CT is relatively low-cost, simple to perform and easily available making it an excellent tool to supplement radiographs when trying to evaluate a hip prosthesis. Single photon emission computed tomography with CT (SPECT-CT) is an emerging modality which has shown to combine the sensitivity that bone scintigraphy offers with the high specificity of CT. SPECT imaging also has the advantage of showing the bone's metabolic activity and is less prone to metal artifact than Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI has evolved to become an important diagnostic tool for the evaluation of THR in the post-operative period. Optimized pulse sequences and metal artifact reduction techniques have made MRI a useful tool in diagnosis of soft tissue abnormalities and is particularly useful in identifying adverse local tissue reactions in metal on metal implants. CT and MRI are accurate in identifying the diagnosis of most causes of THR complications except infection. Research confirms that leukocyte-marrow scintigraphy is the modality of choice for accurately diagnosing prosthetic joint infection and reassures us of its superiority over other nuclear medicine imaging. However, due to the limited availability and increased costs when performing leukocyte-marrow scintigraphy, CT and SPECT-CT would be a more preferred option when suspecting prosthesis infection. Ultrasound (US) has a limited role in the assessment of most THR complications but can be useful to identify peri-prosthetic fluid collections and the presence of soft tissue sinus tracts. Being aware of the imaging modalities that are available to orthopedic surgeons, and discussing these challenging cases with specialist radiologists will enable optimal management of THR complications.

Citing Articles

Imaging evaluation of periprosthetic loosening: A primer for the general radiologist.

Shet S, Kakish E, Murphy S, Roopnarinesingh R, Power S, Maher M World J Radiol. 2025; 17(2):102373.

PMID: 40060958 PMC: 11885930. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102373.


Failure Modes in Orthopedic Oncologic Reconstructive Surgery: A Review of Imaging Findings and Failure Rates.

Shah A, Cardoso F, Souza F, Montreuil J, Pretell-Mazzini J, Temple H Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(10):6245-6266.

PMID: 39451769 PMC: 11506460. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31100465.


The role of MRI in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening following total hip arthroplasty.

Ashkenazi I, Habibi A, Jacobi S, Aggarwal V, Schwarzkopf R, Rozell J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(11):4989-4993.

PMID: 39313640 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05592-z.


Toward Fully Automated Personalized Orthopedic Treatments: Innovations and Interdisciplinary Gaps.

Luo Y Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39199775 PMC: 11351140. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080817.


Diagnostic and prognostic relevance of plain radiographs for periprosthetic joint infections of the hip: a literature review.

Hofmann U, Eleftherakis G, Migliorini F, Fink B, Mederake M Eur J Med Res. 2024; 29(1):314.

PMID: 38849967 PMC: 11161982. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01891-8.


References
1.
Mulhall K, Masterson E, Burke T . Routine recovery room radiographs after total hip arthroplasty: ineffective for screening and unsuitable as baseline for longitudinal follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(3):313-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.08.021. View

2.
Hamilton W, McAuley J . Evaluation of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2004; 53:87-92. View

3.
Love C, Palestro C . Radionuclide imaging of infection. J Nucl Med Technol. 2004; 32(2):47-57. View

4.
Clohisy J, Calvert G, Tull F, McDonald D, Maloney W . Reasons for revision hip surgery: a retrospective review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (429):188-92. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150126.73024.42. View

5.
Palestro C, Love C, Tronco G, Tomas M, Rini J . Combined labeled leukocyte and technetium 99m sulfur colloid bone marrow imaging for diagnosing musculoskeletal infection. Radiographics. 2006; 26(3):859-70. DOI: 10.1148/rg.263055139. View