» Articles » PMID: 31266506

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Potential Efficacy, Feasibility and Acceptability of an M-health Intervention Targeting Parents of School Aged Children to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Foods Packed in the Lunchbox 'SWAP IT'

Abstract

Background: Scalable interventions that improve the nutritional quality of foods in children's lunchboxes have considerable potential to improve child public health nutrition. This study assessed the potential efficacy, feasibility and acceptability of an m-health intervention, 'SWAP IT', to improve the energy and nutritional quality of foods packed in children's lunchboxes.

Methods: The study employed a 2X2 factorial cluster randomized-controlled trial design. Twelve primary schools in New South Wales, Australia were randomly allocated to one of four groups: (i) no intervention;(ii) physical activity intervention only;(iii) lunchbox intervention only; or(iv) physical activity and lunchbox intervention combined. The two intervention strategies were evaluated separately. This paper focuses on the effects of the lunchbox intervention only. The lunchbox intervention comprised four strategies: 1) school nutrition guidelines; 2) lunchbox lessons; 3) information pushed to parents via a school-communication app and 4) parent resources addressing barriers to packing healthy lunchboxes. Outcome measures were taken at baseline and immediately post-intervention (10 weeks) and included measures of effectiveness (mean energy (kJ) packed in lunchboxes, total energy and percentage energy from recommended foods consistent with Australian Dietary Guidelines), feasibility (of delivering intervention to schools, parent app engagement and behaviour change) and acceptability to school staff and parents. Linear mixed models were used to assess intervention efficacy.

Results: Of the 1915 lunchbox observations, at follow-up there was no significant differences between intervention and control group in mean energy of foods packed within lunchboxes (- 118.39 kJ, CI = -307.08, 70.30, p = 0.22). There was a significant increase favouring the intervention in the secondary outcome of mean lunchbox energy from recommended foods (79.21 kJ, CI = 1.99, 156.43, p = 0.04), and a non-significant increase in percentage of lunchbox energy from recommended foods in intervention schools (4.57%, CI = -0.52, 9.66, p = 0.08). The views of the messages pushed via the app ranged from 387 to 1550 views per week (mean views =1025 per week). A large proportion (71%) of parents reported awareness of the intervention, making healthier swaps in the lunchbox (55%), and pushed content was helpful (84%).

Conclusion: The study is the first RCT to assess the potential of a multi-component m-health lunchbox intervention. The intervention was feasible, acceptable and potentially effective in improving the nutritional quality of foods packed within children's lunchboxes.

Trial Registration: Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN: ACTRN12616001228471 .

Citing Articles

Improving the adoption of a school-based nutrition program: findings from a collaborative network of randomised trials.

Barnes C, Sutherland R, Janssen L, Jones J, Robertson K, Gowland-Ella J Implement Sci. 2025; 20(1):5.

PMID: 39819778 PMC: 11740436. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-025-01417-8.


Learning health systems to implement chronic disease prevention programs: A novel framework and perspectives from an Australian health service.

Wolfenden L, Wiggers J, Barnes C, Lane C, Groombridge D, Robertson K Learn Health Syst. 2024; 8(4):e10466.

PMID: 39444504 PMC: 11493556. DOI: 10.1002/lrh2.10466.


Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old.

Spiga F, Davies A, Tomlinson E, Moore T, Dawson S, Breheny K Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 5:CD015328.

PMID: 38763517 PMC: 11102828. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015328.pub2.


A collaborative network trial to evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies to maximize adoption of a school-based healthy lunchbox program: a study protocol.

Barnes C, Jones J, Wolfenden L, Robertson K, Seidler A, Norman J Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1367017.

PMID: 38601495 PMC: 11004312. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1367017.


Unpacking the cost of the lunchbox for Australian families: a secondary analysis.

Manson A, Johnson B, Wolfenden L, Sutherland R, Golley R Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(1).

PMID: 38198723 PMC: 10781432. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daad194.


References
1.
Bell A, Swinburn B . What are the key food groups to target for preventing obesity and improving nutrition in schools?. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004; 58(2):258-63. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601775. View

2.
Bandura A . Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31(2):143-64. DOI: 10.1177/1090198104263660. View

3.
Sanigorski A, Bell A, Kremer P, Swinburn B . Lunchbox contents of Australian school children: room for improvement. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005; 59(11):1310-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602244. View

4.
Kremer P, Bell A, Swinburn B . Calibration and reliability of a school food checklist: a new tool for assessing school food and beverage consumption. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2006; 15(4):465-73. View

5.
Laurence S, Peterken R, Burns C . Fresh Kids: the efficacy of a Health Promoting Schools approach to increasing consumption of fruit and water in Australia. Health Promot Int. 2007; 22(3):218-26. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dam016. View