» Articles » PMID: 31249980

Diagnosing Recurrent DVT of the Leg by Two Different Non-Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging Techniques: A Pilot Study

Overview
Journal TH Open
Publisher Thieme
Date 2019 Jun 29
PMID 31249980
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) is a promising technique to improve the diagnostic management of patients with a suspected ipsilateral recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by direct visualization of a thrombus. Another magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique, T1-weighted turbo spin-echo spectral attenuated inversion recovery (TSE-SPAIR), has the potential to image a thrombus directly with a high spatial resolution as well. The main aim of this pilot study was to investigate if adding the TSE-SPAIR sequence to an MRDTI sequence performed in patients with suspected recurrent DVT may increase the diagnostic confidence of expert MRDTI readers.  Fifteen patients with suspected acute recurrent DVT were included in this study. The TSE-SPAIR sequence was scanned directly after the MRDTI scan but not used to guide clinical decision making, and both scans were adjudicated post hoc two times separately by three independent expert MRDTI readers. Diagnostic confidence was scored on a 4-point Likert scale: (1) poor (definite diagnosis impossible), (2) fair (evaluation of major findings possible), (3) good (definite diagnosis possible), and (4) excellent (exact diagnosis possible).  The diagnostic confidence of expert readers increased when adding the TSE-SPAIR sequence on top of the MRDTI sequence from "good" (median, 3.0; interquartile range [IQR], 2.66-3.0) to "excellent" (median, 3.67; IQR 3.33-3.67;  = 0.001). Evaluation of the scans in the reversed order 5 months after initial reading showed similar results. Diagnostic accuracy for proximal DVT of both scan techniques was good.  The extra TSE-SPAIR sequence may help increase diagnostic confidence of radiologists in cases of uncertain diagnosis in patients with suspected ipsilateral recurrent DVT.

Citing Articles

Detection of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis by magnetic resonance non-contrast thrombus imaging.

van Dam L, Dronkers C, Gautam G, Eckerbom A, Ghanima W, Gleditsch J J Thromb Haemost. 2021; 19(8):1973-1980.

PMID: 34018662 PMC: 8361740. DOI: 10.1111/jth.15394.


Recent advances in understanding, diagnosing and treating venous thrombosis.

Chan N, Weitz J F1000Res. 2020; 9.

PMID: 33082930 PMC: 7539078. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.27115.1.


High Signal Intensity on Diffusion-Weighted Images Reflects Acute Phase of Deep Vein Thrombus.

Gi T, Kuroiwa Y, Yamashita A, Mizutani Y, Asanuma T, Miyati T Thromb Haemost. 2020; 120(10):1463-1473.

PMID: 32746467 PMC: 7511261. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714280.

References
1.
Fraser D, Moody A, Morgan P, Martel A, Davidson I . Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136(2):89-98. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00006. View

2.
Piovella F, Crippa L, Barone M, Vigano DAngelo S, Serafini S, Galli L . Normalization rates of compression ultrasonography in patients with a first episode of deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs: association with recurrence and new thrombosis. Haematologica. 2002; 87(5):515-22. View

3.
Prandoni P, Lensing A, Bernardi E, Villalta S, Bagatella P, Girolami A . The diagnostic value of compression ultrasonography in patients with suspected recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2002; 88(3):402-6. View

4.
Schmitz S, ORegan D, Gibson D, Cunningham C, Fitzpatrick J, Allsop J . Technical report: Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging at 3 T field strength in patients with lower limb deep vein thrombosis: a feasibility study. Clin Radiol. 2006; 61(3):282-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.10.009. View

5.
Zhang Z, Fan Z, Carroll T, Chung Y, Weale P, Jerecic R . Three-dimensional T2-weighted MRI of the human femoral arterial vessel wall at 3.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2009; 44(9):619-26. PMC: 2843396. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181b4c218. View