» Articles » PMID: 12353067

The Diagnostic Value of Compression Ultrasonography in Patients with Suspected Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis

Overview
Journal Thromb Haemost
Publisher Thieme
Date 2002 Sep 28
PMID 12353067
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diagnosis of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is difficult because of limitations in distinguishing acute from old thrombi. In the past, an ultrasound method for diagnosis of recurrent ipsilateral DVT was developed, which relies on repeated measurements of the diameters of the common femoral and popliteal veins. To assess the safety of withholding anticoagulation from patients with improved or stable compression vein diameters, 205 consecutive patients presenting with suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT were evaluated. The vein diameter was measured under compression with the transducer and compared with earlier ultrasound results. Patients with stable or improved ultrasound findings had repeat ultrasound assessments after 2 (+/- 1) and 7 (+/- 1) days. Patients with repeatedly normal ultrasound results were followed-up for six months to determine the incidence of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism. Of the 205 patients, 153 had stable or improved ultrasound findings. Repeat ultrasound assessment became abnormal in 3, and recurrence was confirmed by venography in all. A six months follow-up was done in the remaining 150 patients with repeatedly normal ultrasound tests and showed 2 (1.3%; 95% CI, 0.02 to 4.7%) confirmed non-fatal venous thromboembolic complications. The positive predictive value of a stable or improved ultrasound was 90% (95% CI, 77 to 97%). In conclusion, it is safe to withhold anticoagulant treatment from patients with suspected recurrent ipsilateral DVT in whom compression ultrasonography showed improved or stable vein diameters.

Citing Articles

Joint Guideline on Venous Thromboembolism - 2022.

Albricker A, Freire C, Santos S, Alcantara M, Saleh M, Cantisano A Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022; 118(4):797-857.

PMID: 35508060 PMC: 9007000. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20220213.


Predicting Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Deep-Vein Thrombosis: Development and Internal Validation of a Potential New Prediction Model (Continu-8).

Nagler M, van Kuijk S, Ten Cate H, Prins M, Ten Cate-Hoek A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:655226.

PMID: 33889600 PMC: 8055939. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.655226.


Prevalence of venous obstructions in (recurrent) venous thromboembolism: a case-control study.

Notten P, Strijkers R, Toonder I, Ten Cate H, Ten Cate-Hoek A Thromb J. 2020; 18:23.

PMID: 32973405 PMC: 7493864. DOI: 10.1186/s12959-020-00238-7.


Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy.

Bhatt M, Braun C, Patel P, Patel P, Begum H, Wiercioch W Blood Adv. 2020; 4(7):1250-1264.

PMID: 32227213 PMC: 7160276. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000960.


Diagnostic accuracy of three ultrasonography strategies for deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kraaijpoel N, Carrier M, Le Gal G, McInnes M, Salameh J, McGrath T PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0228788.

PMID: 32045437 PMC: 7012434. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228788.