» Articles » PMID: 31249911

The IMPROVEDD VTE Risk Score: Incorporation of D-Dimer into the IMPROVE Score to Improve Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification

Overview
Journal TH Open
Publisher Thieme
Date 2019 Jun 29
PMID 31249911
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

 The IMPROVE score is a validated venous thromboembolism (VTE) assessment tool to risk stratify hospitalized, medically ill patients based on clinical variables. It was hypothesized that addition of D-dimer measurement to derive a new IMPROVEDD score would improve identification of at risk of VTE.  The association of the IMPROVE score and D-dimer ≥ 2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN) with the risk of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, or VTE-related death was evaluated in 7,441 hospitalized, medically ill patients randomized in the APEX trial. Based on the Cox regression analysis, the IMPROVEDD score was derived by adding two points to the IMPROVE score if the D-dimer was ≥ 2 × ULN.  Baseline D-dimer was independently associated with symptomatic VTE through 77 days (adjusted HR: 2.22 [95% CI: 1.38-1.58],  = 0.001). Incorporation of D-dimer into the IMPROVE score improved VTE risk discrimination (ΔAUC: 0.06 [95% CI: 0.02-0.09],  = 0.0006) and reclassification (continuous NRI: 0.34 [95% CI: 0.17-0.51],  = 0.001; categorical NRI: 0.13 [95% CI: 0.03-0.23],  = 0.0159). Patients with an IMPROVEDD score of ≥2 had a greater VTE risk compared with those with an IMPROVEDD score of 0 to 1 (HR: 2.73 [95% CI: 1.52-4.90],  = 0.0007).  Incorporation of D-dimer into the IMPROVE VTE risk assessment model further improves risk stratification in hospitalized, medically ill patients who received thromboprophylaxis. An IMPROVEDD score of ≥2 identifies hospitalized, medically ill patients with a heightened risk for VTE through 77 days.

Citing Articles

D-dimer Levels in Acute, Medically Ill, Hospitalized Patients: A Large, Prospective, Multicenter Study in the United States.

Richardson J, Clark C, Bastani A, Shams A, Fermann G, Hiestand B Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025; 31:10760296251320406.

PMID: 39943869 PMC: 11822829. DOI: 10.1177/10760296251320406.


From Cell Interactions to Bedside Practice: Complete Blood Count-Derived Biomarkers with Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential in Venous Thromboembolism.

Murariu-Gligor E, Muresan S, Cotoi O J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797287 PMC: 11721038. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010205.


Standard- versus extended-duration anticoagulation for primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients.

Kolkailah A, Abdelghaffar B, Elshafeey F, Magdy R, Kamel M, Abuelnaga Y Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 12:CD014541.

PMID: 39629741 PMC: 11616008. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014541.pub2.


Extended thromboprophylaxis in heart failure patients; the unmet need.

Al Yami M, Alshehri A, Alay S, Aljoufi A, Alsulimani M, Algarni S Heart Fail Rev. 2024; 29(5):1107-1116.

PMID: 39014135 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-024-10422-w.


Do Decision Support Tools Decrease the Prevalence of Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolisms When Compared to Clinical Judgement? A Single-Center Pre-Post Study.

Abdulelah M, Haider O, McAuliffe M, Al-Faris L, Paadam J, Medarametla V J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999420 PMC: 11242558. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133854.


References
1.
Pabinger I, Thaler J, Ay C . Biomarkers for prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer. Blood. 2013; 122(12):2011-8. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-460147. View

2.
Lippi G, Tripodi A, Simundic A, Favaloro E . International survey on D-dimer test reporting: a call for standardization. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2015; 41(3):287-93. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1549092. View

3.
Rosenberg D, Eichorn A, Alarcon M, McCullagh L, McGinn T, Spyropoulos A . External validation of the risk assessment model of the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) for medical patients in a tertiary health system. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014; 3(6):e001152. PMC: 4338701. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001152. View

4.
Vickers A, Elkin E . Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006; 26(6):565-74. PMC: 2577036. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06295361. View

5.
Catterick D, Hunt B . Impact of the national venous thromboembolism risk assessment tool in secondary care in England: retrospective population-based database study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2014; 25(6):571-6. PMC: 4162339. DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000100. View