» Articles » PMID: 31249831

Hypoxia Imaging and Adaptive Radiotherapy: A State-of-the-Art Approach in the Management of Glioma

Abstract

Severe hypoxia [oxygen partial pressure (pO) below 5-10 mmHg] is more frequent in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) compared to lower-grade gliomas. Seminal studies in the 1950s demonstrated that hypoxia was associated with increased resistance to low-linear energy transfer (LET) ionizing radiation. In experimental conditions, the total radiation dose has to be multiplied by a factor of 3 to achieve the same cell lethality in anoxic situations. The presence of hypoxia in human tumors is assumed to contribute to treatment failures after radiotherapy (RT) in cancer patients. Therefore, a logical way to overcome hypoxia-induced radioresistance would be to deliver substantially higher doses of RT in hypoxic volumes delineated on pre-treatment imaging as biological target volumes (BTVs). Such an approach faces various fundamental, technical, and clinical challenges. The present review addresses several technical points related to the delineation of hypoxic zones, which include: spatial accuracy, quantitative vs. relative threshold, variations of hypoxia levels during RT, and availability of hypoxia tracers. The feasibility of hypoxia imaging as an assessment tool for early tumor response to RT and for predicting long-term outcomes is discussed. Hypoxia imaging for RT dose painting is likewise examined. As for the radiation oncologist's point of view, hypoxia maps should be converted into dose-distribution objectives for RT planning. Taking into account the physics and the radiobiology of various irradiation beams, preliminary studies are required to investigate the feasibility of dose escalation in terms of normal tissue tolerance before clinical trials are undertaken.

Citing Articles

Data Science Opportunities To Improve Radiotherapy Planning and Clinical Decision Making.

Deasy J Semin Radiat Oncol. 2024; 34(4):379-394.

PMID: 39271273 PMC: 11698470. DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.07.012.


Targeting drug resistance in glioblastoma (Review).

Sherman J, Bobak A, Arsiwala T, Lockman P, Aulakh S Int J Oncol. 2024; 65(2).

PMID: 38994761 PMC: 11251740. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2024.5668.


Glut-3 Gene Knockdown as a Potential Strategy to Overcome Glioblastoma Radioresistance.

Pucci G, Minafra L, Bravata V, Calvaruso M, Turturici G, Cammarata F Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(4).

PMID: 38396757 PMC: 10889562. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25042079.


The MANGO study: a prospective investigation of oxygen enhanced and blood-oxygen level dependent MRI as imaging biomarkers of hypoxia in glioblastoma.

Brighi C, Waddington D, Keall P, Booth J, OBrien K, Silvester S Front Oncol. 2024; 13:1306164.

PMID: 38192626 PMC: 10773871. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1306164.


Carbon Ions for Hypoxic Tumors: Are We Making the Most of Them?.

Sokol O, Durante M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760464 PMC: 10526811. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184494.


References
1.
Norton L, Simon R, Brereton H, BOGDEN A . Predicting the course of Gompertzian growth. Nature. 1976; 264(5586):542-5. DOI: 10.1038/264542a0. View

2.
Collingridge D, Piepmeier J, Rockwell S, Knisely J . Polarographic measurements of oxygen tension in human glioma and surrounding peritumoural brain tissue. Radiother Oncol. 2000; 53(2):127-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00121-8. View

3.
Ling C, Humm J, Larson S, Amols H, Fuks Z, Leibel S . Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 47(3):551-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00467-3. View

4.
Furusawa Y, Fukutsu K, Aoki M, Itsukaichi H, Eguchi-Kasai K, Ohara H . Inactivation of aerobic and hypoxic cells from three different cell lines by accelerated (3)He-, (12)C- and (20)Ne-ion beams. Radiat Res. 2000; 154(5):485-96. DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0485:ioaahc]2.0.co;2. View

5.
Chao K, Bosch W, Mutic S, Lewis J, Dehdashti F, Mintun M . A novel approach to overcome hypoxic tumor resistance: Cu-ATSM-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 49(4):1171-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01433-4. View