A Cross Sectional Analytic Study of Modes of Delivery and Caesarean Section Rates in a Private Health Insured South African Population

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2019 Jun 28

PMID 31247013

Citations 6

Authors

Geetesh Solanki

Susan Fawcus

Emmanuelle Daviaud

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Monitoring Caesarean Section (CS) rates is essential to ensure optimal use of the procedure. Information on CS rates in the South African private sector is limited and information from this study will assist in planning for the proposed NHI in South Africa.

Objectives: The objectives of this paper are to assess mode of delivery patterns and to determine CS rates amongst South African private health insurance scheme members; and to assess the extent to which CS rates are influenced by age and health status of the mother.

Methods: The 2015 claims for members of 10 health insurance schemes were analysed to assess delivery type patterns. Mode of delivery patterns were assessed by 6 delivery types: emergency, elective and "other" for caesarean deliveries; and non-assisted, assisted and "other" for vaginal deliveries; as well as by age and health condition of the mother.

Results: Of a total of 6,542 births analysed, 4,815 were CS giving a CS rate of 73·6% (95% CI 72·5%;74·7%). Emergency CS were the most common mode of delivery (39·7%), followed by elective CS (39·5%). CS rates increased with increasing maternal age and were higher for women with a medical condition.

Conclusions: CS rates for the South African private sector are considerably higher than the safe rates recommended by the WHO. The high CS rates is a cause for concern for the health system under the proposed NHI. To support initiatives encouraging evidence based practice, further research is required to understand the drivers for the high CS rates.

Citing Articles

Case for improving respectful care: results from a cross-sectional survey of person-centred maternity care in rural South Africa.

Doherty T, Horwood C, Mapumulo S, Haskins L, Manda S, Penn-Kekana L BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(2):e001086.

PMID: 40018554 PMC: 11816963. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001086.

A review of the use of CT pulmonary angiography in pregnant and postpartum women at an academic centre.

Herbst W, Bhoora S, Moodley H, Ranchod A, Westgarth-Taylor T, Zamparini J Obstet Med. 2024; :1753495X241290551.

PMID: 39553164 PMC: 11563497. DOI: 10.1177/1753495X241290551.

Epidemiology of emergency and elective caesarean section and its association with early neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan African countries.

Sandie A, Mutua M, Sidze E, Nyakangi V, Sylla E, Wanjoya A BMJ Open. 2023; 13(10):e074995.

PMID: 37827732 PMC: 10582852. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074995.

Models using private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries at five South African district public hospitals: insights for public-private contracting for obstetric care in rural areas.

Solanki G, Daviaud E, Fawcus S, Brijlal V, Doherty T Glob Health Action. 2023; 16(1):2241811.

PMID: 37552135 PMC: 10411302. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2241811.

Experiences of public-private contracting for caesarean delivery in rural district public hospitals: A qualitative interview study.

Doherty T, Fawcus S, Daviaud E, Bartmann Y, Solanki G PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 3(5):e0001335.

PMID: 37155593 PMC: 10166521. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001335.

References

Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse D, Barros A, Barros F, Juan L . Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1341-1348. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7. View

Betran A, Ye J, Moller A, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu A, Torloni M . The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016; 11(2):e0148343. PMC: 4743929. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. View

Souza J, Gulmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B . Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010; 8:71. PMC: 2993644. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-71. View

Betran A, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni M . Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1358-1368. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5. View

Low J . Caesarean section--past and present. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010; 31(12):1131-6. DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34373-0. View

Sandall J, Tribe R, Avery L, Mola G, Visser G, Homer C . Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1349-1357. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5. View

Liu N, Mazzoni A, Zamberlin N, Colomar M, Chang O, Arnaud L . Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2013; 10(1):2. PMC: 3561262. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-2. View

Mazzoni A, Althabe F, Liu N, Bonotti A, Gibbons L, Sanchez A . Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BJOG. 2010; 118(4):391-9. PMC: 3312015. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02793.x. View

Bailey P, Van Roosmalen J, Mola G, Evans C, de Bernis L, Dao B . Assisted vaginal delivery in low and middle income countries: an overview. BJOG. 2017; 124(9):1335-1344. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14477. View

10.

Wiklund I, Malata A, Cheung N, Cadee F . Appropriate use of caesarean section globally requires a different approach. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1288-1289. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32325-0. View

11.

H A Visser G, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea E, De Bernis L, Di Renzo G, Escobar Vidarte M . FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1286-1287. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32113-5. View

12.

MacFarlane A, Blondel B, Mohangoo A, Cuttini M, Nijhuis J, Novak Z . Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG. 2015; 123(4):559-68. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13284. View

13.

Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D . Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 4:CD004667. PMC: 8663203. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5. View

14.

Gibbons L, Belizan J, Lauer J, Betran A, Merialdi M, Althabe F . Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206(4):331.e1-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.026. View

15.

Betran A, Torloni M, Zhang J, Gulmezoglu A . WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG. 2015; 123(5):667-70. PMC: 5034743. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. View

16.

Pattinson R, Vannevel V, Barnard D, Baloyi S, Gebhardt G, Le Roux K . Failure to perform assisted deliveries is resulting in an increased neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality: An expert opinion. S Afr Med J. 2018; 108(2):75-78. DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v108i2.12786. View