» Articles » PMID: 31242685

Validation of Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register Telephone Survey of 2769 Patients Operated for Total Knee Replacement

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Jun 28
PMID 31242685
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: The aim of our study is to validate the registration of knee arthroplasty revisions in the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register (LAR) and thus give an indication of the accuracy of the published revision rates. : A total of 4269 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) registered in the LAR between 2013 and 2015 were included. Two years after surgery the patients were contacted by phone in order to inquire if they had been subject to revision. The information from the patients was then cross checked against what had been registered in the LAR, and in case of a revision not having been registered hospital charts were investigated. Thus, the patients were followed up with regarding revision and/or death until 2017. A true revision was defined as an addition, exchange, or removal of one or all components. : Out of 4269 primary TKAs, we managed to contact and interview 2769 patients. Nine small hospitals were not able to provide contact details (telephone numbers) for 533 patients (549 knees). Sixty-seven patients (67 knees) were deceased (data from the Lithuanian National Census Register) and a further 438 patients (565 knees) appeared to have a wrong or non-valid telephone number, leaving 3031 (3091 knees) patients being contacted. Of those, 262 patients (266 knees) refused to participate in the study which left 2769 responders (2825 knees). Sixty-one patients said that reoperation had been performed on the index knee within two years of their primary surgery. After checking with the clinics, 10 were surgical procedures on the knee but not true revisions by our criteria. Out of the 51 true revisions we found that 46 were registered to the LAR as revised, while five (9.8%) revisions were missing. : We conclude that the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register has a good completeness of registered revision TKAs as only 9.8% of revisions were missing.

Citing Articles

Different microbial and resistance patterns in primary total knee arthroplasty infections - a report on 283 patients from Lithuania and Sweden.

Sebastian S, Sezgin E, Stucinskas J, Tarasevicius S, Liu Y, Raina D BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):800.

PMID: 34535109 PMC: 8449428. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04689-5.

References
1.
Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L . Validation of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a postal survey regarding 30,376 knees operated on between 1975 and 1995. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000; 70(5):467-72. DOI: 10.3109/17453679909000982. View

2.
Fender D, Harper W, Gregg P . The Trent regional arthroplasty study. Experiences with a hip register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(7):944-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b7.10762. View

3.
Gunnarsson U, Seligsohn E, Jestin P, Pahlman L . Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2003; 90(4):454-9. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4058. View

4.
Faro L, Huiskes R . Quality assurance of joint replacement. Legal regulation and medical judgement. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1992; 250:1-33. DOI: 10.3109/17453679209155045. View

5.
Arthursson A, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin L, Soreide J . Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register: 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003. Acta Orthop. 2006; 76(6):823-8. DOI: 10.1080/17453670510045435. View