» Articles » PMID: 25172602

First Outcome Results After Total Knee and Hip Replacement from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Aug 31
PMID 25172602
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objective: In 2010, the Lithuanian Association of Arhtroplasty was established and on January 1, 2011, initiated a national study of all reoperations after total knee (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) in Lithuania. The aim of the study was to investigate the revision rates after TKR and THR at two years follow-up.

Materials And Methods: Lithuanian patients undergoing primary TKR and THR from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012, were included in the study. The patient, surgery and prosthetic implantation data were collected via internet database. For reoperations we recorded the reason and type of revision, primary implantation date. We analyzed implant survival rates using any revision as an endpoint on included primary procedures, performed until September 1, 2013.

Results: The completeness of the register verified with state patients fund data reached 85% of all replacements. Out of 3823 primary TKR during the study period 25 revisions were performed with overall implant survival rate 99%. The main reason for knee revision was infections. During the inclusion period we registered 6072 primary THR and 149 revisions with overall implant survival rate 97%. Recurrent dislocation of prosthetic component was the main reason for hip revision. Significantly inferior survival results for femoral neck fracture patients were observed as compared with patients operated for osteoarthritis. Posterior approach as compared to others significantly affected inferior implant survival rates for femoral neck fracture patients.

Conclusions: The overall survival after total knee and hip replacements revealed a high treatment quality of this surgery in Lithuania.

Citing Articles

Risk Factors for Revision After Early and Delayed Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation. An Analysis of Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register.

Masionis P, Vileikis T, Kvederas G, Uvarovas V, Satkauskas I, Sveikata T Cureus. 2021; 13(3):e14155.

PMID: 33936869 PMC: 8078143. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14155.


Validation of Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register Telephone Survey of 2769 Patients Operated for Total Knee Replacement.

Terteliene E, Grigaitis K, Robertsson O, Porvaneckas N, Dadoniene J, Venalis A Medicina (Kaunas). 2019; 55(6).

PMID: 31242685 PMC: 6630277. DOI: 10.3390/medicina55060310.


Inadequate evaluation and management of suspected -infections after TKA surgery in Lithuania: a retrospective study of 2,769 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Terteliene E, Grigaitis K, Robertsson O, Stucinskas J, Tarasevicius S, Porvaneckas N Acta Orthop. 2019; 90(4):373-376.

PMID: 31070495 PMC: 6718185. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1614763.


Comparison of dual mobility cup and other surgical construts used for three hundred and sixty two first time hip revisions due to recurrent dislocations: five year results from Lithuanian arthroplasty register.

Stucinskas J, Kalvaitis T, Smailys A, Robertsson O, Tarasevicius S Int Orthop. 2017; 42(5):1015-1020.

PMID: 29196791 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3702-0.


Contemporary dual-mobility cup regional and private register: methodology and results.

Ferreira A, Prudhon J, Verdier R, Puch J, Descamps L, Dehri G Int Orthop. 2017; 41(3):439-445.

PMID: 28197703 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3405-6.