» Articles » PMID: 31239778

Current Status of Liquid Biopsies for the Detection and Management of Prostate Cancer

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Jun 27
PMID 31239778
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, new therapeutic options have become available for prostate cancer (PC) patients, generating an urgent need for better biomarkers to guide the choice of therapy and monitor treatment response. Liquid biopsies, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating nucleic acids, and exosomes, have been developed as minimally invasive assays allowing oncologists to monitor PC patients with real-time cellular or molecular information. While CTC counts remain the most extensively validated prognostic biomarker to monitor treatment response, recent advances demonstrate that CTC morphology and androgen receptor characterization can provide additional information to guide the choice of treatment. Characterization of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is another rapidly emerging field with novel technologies capable of monitoring the evolution of treatment relevant alterations such as those in DNA damage repair genes for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition. In addition, several new liquid biopsy fields are emerging, including the characterization of heterogeneity, CTC RNA sequencing, the culture and xenografting of CTCs, and the characterization of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and circulating microRNAs. This review describes the clinical utilization of liquid biopsies in the management of PC patients and emerging liquid biopsy technologies with the potential to advance personalized cancer therapy.

Citing Articles

Fusion MRI/Ultrasound-Guided Transperineal Biopsy: A Game Changer in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.

Giannakodimos I, Kaltsas A, Moulavasilis N, Kratiras Z, Mitropoulos D, Chrisofos M J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860459 PMC: 11765810. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020453.


Circulating Tumor Cell Count and Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Goldkorn A, Tangen C, Plets M, Bsteh D, Xu T, Pinski J JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(10):e2437871.

PMID: 39374015 PMC: 11581504. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.37871.


Liquid Biopsy in the Clinical Management of Cancers.

Ho H, Chung K, Kan C, Wong S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).

PMID: 39201281 PMC: 11354853. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168594.


Prostate cancer genotyping for risk stratification and precision treatment.

Kumar A Curr Urol. 2024; 18(2):87-97.

PMID: 39176294 PMC: 11337998. DOI: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000222.


UPCARE: Urinary Extracellular Vesicles-Derived Prostate Cancer Assessment for Risk Evaluation.

Jiang S, Lu F, Chen J, Jiao Y, Qiu Q, Nian X J Extracell Vesicles. 2024; 13(8):e12491.

PMID: 39175282 PMC: 11341834. DOI: 10.1002/jev2.12491.


References
1.
Vona G, Sabile A, Louha M, Sitruk V, Romana S, Schutze K . Isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells : a new method for the immunomorphological and molecular characterization of circulatingtumor cells. Am J Pathol. 2000; 156(1):57-63. PMC: 1868645. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64706-2. View

2.
. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 69(3):89-95. DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2001.113989. View

3.
Klein C, Seidl S, Petat-Dutter K, Offner S, Geigl J, Schmidt-Kittler O . Combined transcriptome and genome analysis of single micrometastatic cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2002; 20(4):387-92. DOI: 10.1038/nbt0402-387. View

4.
Dressman D, Yan H, Traverso G, Kinzler K, Vogelstein B . Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(15):8817-22. PMC: 166396. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1133470100. View

5.
Bartel D . MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004; 116(2):281-97. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. View