» Articles » PMID: 31231441

Use of Molecular Imaging in Clinical Drug Development: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Jun 25
PMID 31231441
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Molecular imaging such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can provide the crucial pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic information of a drug non-invasively at an early stage of clinical drug development. Nevertheless, not much has been known how molecular imaging has been actually used in drug development studies.

Methods: We searched PubMed using such keywords as molecular imaging, PET, SPECT, drug development, and new drug, or any combination of those to select papers in English, published from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2015. The information about the publication year, therapeutic area of a drug candidate, drug development phase, and imaging modality and utility of imaging were extracted.

Results: Of 10,264 papers initially screened, 208 papers met the eligibility criteria. The more recent the publication year, the bigger the number of papers, particularly since 2010. The two major therapeutic areas using molecular imaging to develop drugs were oncology (47.6%) and the central nervous system (CNS, 36.5%), in which efficacy (63.5%) and proof-of-concept through either receptor occupancy (RO) or other than RO (29.7%), respectively, were the primary utility of molecular imaging. PET was used 4.7 times more frequently than SPECT. Molecular imaging was most frequently used in phase I clinical trials (40.8%), whereas it was employed rarely in phase 0 or exploratory IND studies (1.4%).

Conclusions: The present study confirmed the trend that molecular imaging has been more actively employed in recent clinical drug development studies although its adoption was rather slow and rare in phase 0 studies.

Citing Articles

Recent Progress in Synthesis of Tc-labeled Complexes with Nitroimidazoles as SPECT Probes for Targeting Tumor Hypoxia.

Nguyen A, Kim H Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 58(5):258-278.

PMID: 39036459 PMC: 11255181. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-024-00860-7.


Medicinal (Radio) Chemistry: Building Radiopharmaceuticals for the Future.

Pijeira M, Nunes P, Chaviano S, Diaz A, DaSilva J, Ricci-Junior E Curr Med Chem. 2023; 31(34):5481-5534.

PMID: 37594105 DOI: 10.2174/0929867331666230818092634.


Neuroimaging with SPECT-MRI: a myth or reality?.

Perera Molligoda Arachchige A AIMS Neurosci. 2023; 10(1):52-55.

PMID: 37077955 PMC: 10106334. DOI: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023004.


New Long-Acting [Zr]Zr-DFO GLP-1 PET Tracers with Increased Molar Activity and Reduced Kidney Accumulation.

Wilbs J, Raave R, Boswinkel M, Glendorf T, Rodriguez D, Fernandes E J Med Chem. 2023; 66(12):7772-7784.

PMID: 36995126 PMC: 10292199. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c02073.


Advances in aptamer-based nuclear imaging.

Song W, Song Y, Li Q, Fan C, Lan X, Jiang D Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022; 49(8):2544-2559.

PMID: 35394153 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05782-0.


References
1.
Beyer T, Townsend D, Brun T, Kinahan P, Charron M, Roddy R . A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med. 2000; 41(8):1369-79. View

2.
Saleem A, Harte R, Matthews J, Osman S, Brady F, Luthra S . Pharmacokinetic evaluation of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide in patients by positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(5):1421-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.5.1421. View

3.
Aboagye E, Price P, Jones T . In vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development using positron-emission tomography. Drug Discov Today. 2001; 6(6):293-302. DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6446(01)01684-1. View

4.
Townsend D, Cherry S . Combining anatomy and function: the path to true image fusion. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11(10):1968-74. DOI: 10.1007/s003300101007. View

5.
Fischman A, Alpert N, Rubin R . Pharmacokinetic imaging: a noninvasive method for determining drug distribution and action. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002; 41(8):581-602. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200241080-00003. View