» Articles » PMID: 31218042

Data-driven Mathematical Model of East-Asian Facial Attractiveness: the Relative Contributions of Shape and Reflectance to Attractiveness Judgements

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Jun 21
PMID 31218042
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Facial attractiveness is judged through a combination of multiple cues including morphology (facial shape) and skin properties (facial reflectance). While several studies have examined the way in which people in Western cultures judge facial attractiveness, there have been fewer investigations into non-Western attitudes. This is because stimuli that quantitatively vary the attractiveness of non-Western faces are rare. In the present study, we built a model of the attractiveness of East-Asian faces, judged by East-Asian observers. Therefore, 400 computer-generated East-Asian faces were created and attractiveness rating scores were collected from Japanese observers. Data-driven mathematical calculations were used to identify quantitative links between facial attractiveness and shape and reflectance properties, with no prior hypothesis. Results indicate that faces with larger eyes, smaller noses and brighter skin are judged as more attractive, regardless of the sex of the faces, possibly reflecting a general preference for femininity. Shape is shown to be a strong determinant of attractiveness for both male and female faces, while reflectance properties are less important in judging male facial attractiveness. Our model provides a tool to effectively produce East-Asian face stimuli that quantitatively varies attractiveness and can be used to elucidate visual processes related to attractiveness judgements.

Citing Articles

Red Backgrounds Enhance Dominance in Human Faces and Shapes.

Chen N, Yang Y, Kobayashi M, Nakamura K, Watanabe K Evol Psychol. 2024; 22(3):14747049241284602.

PMID: 39344298 PMC: 11440532. DOI: 10.1177/14747049241284602.


Mate assessment based on physical characteristics: a review and reflection.

Watkins C Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(1):113-130.

PMID: 39175167 PMC: 11718632. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13131.


A computational approach to investigating facial attractiveness factors using geometric morphometric analysis and deep learning.

Sano T, Kawabata H Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19797.

PMID: 37957245 PMC: 10643417. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47084-x.


Facial attractiveness and preference of sexual dimorphism: A comparison across five populations.

Fiala V, Trebicky V, Pazhoohi F, Leongomez J, Turecek P, Saribay S Evol Hum Sci. 2023; 3:e38.

PMID: 37588529 PMC: 10427909. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2021.33.


Attractiveness Evaluation and Identity of Self-face: The Effect of Sexual Dimorphism.

Li Z, Lei X, Yan X, Hu Z, Liu H Iperception. 2021; 12(6):20416695211058799.

PMID: 34881018 PMC: 8646797. DOI: 10.1177/20416695211058799.


References
1.
Fleming A, Corter C, Stallings J, Steiner M . Testosterone and prolactin are associated with emotional responses to infant cries in new fathers. Horm Behav. 2002; 42(4):399-413. DOI: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1840. View

2.
Todorov A, Olivola C, Dotsch R, Mende-Siedlecki P . Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014; 66:519-45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831. View

3.
DeBruine L, Jones B, Smith F, Little A . Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 36(3):751-8. DOI: 10.1037/a0016457. View

4.
Little A . Facial attractiveness. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015; 5(6):621-634. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1316. View

5.
Torrance J, Wincenciak J, Hahn A, DeBruine L, Jones B . The relative contributions of facial shape and surface information to perceptions of attractiveness and dominance. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):e104415. PMC: 4211661. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104415. View