» Articles » PMID: 31209280

Laying the Foundation for Genomically-based Risk Assessment in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract

Outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have substantially improved due to advances in drug development and rational treatment intervention strategies. Despite these significant advances there are still unanswered questions on patient management regarding how to more reliably predict treatment failure at the time of diagnosis and how to select frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for optimal outcome. The BCR-ABL1 transcript level at diagnosis has no established prognostic impact and cannot guide frontline TKI selection. BCR-ABL1 mutations are detected in ~50% of TKI resistant patients but are rarely responsible for primary resistance. Other resistance mechanisms are largely uncharacterized and there are no other routine molecular testing strategies to facilitate the evaluation and further stratification of TKI resistance. Advances in next-generation sequencing technology has aided the management of a growing number of other malignancies, enabling the incorporation of somatic mutation profiles in diagnosis, classification, and prognostication. A largely unexplored area in CML research is whether expanded genomic analysis at diagnosis, resistance, and disease transformation can enhance patient management decisions, as has occurred for other cancers. The aim of this article is to review publications that reported mutated cancer-associated genes in CML patients at various disease phases. We discuss the frequency and type of such variants at initial diagnosis and at the time of treatment failure and transformation. Current limitations in the evaluation of mutants and recommendations for future reporting are outlined. The collective evaluation of mutational studies over more than a decade suggests a limited set of cancer-associated genes are indeed recurrently mutated in CML and some at a relatively high frequency. Genomic studies have the potential to lay the foundation for improved diagnostic risk classification according to clinical and genomic risk, and to enable more precise early identification of TKI resistance.

Citing Articles

Significance of Somatic Mutation Profiling in CML Beyond BCR-ABL: A Retrospective Study of the Indian Population.

Chaudhary P, Chaudhary S, Patel F, Patel S, Patel D, Patel L Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2025; 41(1):10-22.

PMID: 39917513 PMC: 11794774. DOI: 10.1007/s12288-024-01808-9.


Single-cell multiomics analysis of chronic myeloid leukemia links cellular heterogeneity to therapy response.

Warfvinge R, Geironson Ulfsson L, Dhapola P, Safi F, Sommarin M, Soneji S Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 39503729 PMC: 11540304. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.92074.


Blast Transformation of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Driven by Acquisition of t(8;21)(q22;q22)/: Selecting Optimal Treatment Based on Clinical and Molecular Findings.

Fernandez-Sanchez A, Hernandez-Sanchez A, de Ramon C, Chillon M, Vidriales M, Baile-Gonzalez M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39457651 PMC: 11504412. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12102339.


Hsa_circ_0006010 and hsa_circ_0002903 in peripheral blood serve as novel diagnostic, surveillance and prognostic biomarkers for disease progression in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Zhao J, Wang G, Yan G, Zheng M, Li H, Bai Y BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):1172.

PMID: 39304860 PMC: 11414102. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12943-x.


Overcoming clinical BCR-ABL1 compound mutant resistance with combined ponatinib and asciminib therapy.

Eide C, Brewer D, Xie T, Schultz A, Savage S, Muratcioglu S Cancer Cell. 2024; 42(9):1486-1488.

PMID: 39214096 PMC: 11771825. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.08.004.


References
1.
Branford S, Rudzki Z, Walsh S, Parkinson I, Grigg A, Szer J . Detection of BCR-ABL mutations in patients with CML treated with imatinib is virtually always accompanied by clinical resistance, and mutations in the ATP phosphate-binding loop (P-loop) are associated with a poor prognosis. Blood. 2003; 102(1):276-83. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2896. View

2.
Kerkhof J, Schenkel L, Reilly J, McRobbie S, Aref-Eshghi E, Stuart A . Clinical Validation of Copy Number Variant Detection from Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panels. J Mol Diagn. 2017; 19(6):905-920. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.07.004. View

3.
Huang Y, Zheng J, Hu J, Wu Y, Zheng X, Liu T . Discovery of somatic mutations in the progression of chronic myeloid leukemia by whole-exome sequencing. Genet Mol Res. 2014; 13(1):945-53. DOI: 10.4238/2014.February.19.5. View

4.
Kim T, Tyndel M, Kim H, Ahn J, Choi S, Park H . Spectrum of somatic mutation dynamics in chronic myeloid leukemia following tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Blood. 2016; 129(1):38-47. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-04-708560. View

5.
Coyle T, Najfeld V . Translocation (3;21) in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia prior to the onset of blast crisis. Am J Hematol. 1988; 27(1):56-9. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.2830270113. View