» Articles » PMID: 31197849

Anadromy, Potamodromy and Residency in Brown Trout Salmo Trutta: the Role of Genes and the Environment

Overview
Journal J Fish Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Jun 15
PMID 31197849
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Brown trout Salmo trutta is endemic to Europe, western Asia and north-western Africa; it is a prominent member of freshwater and coastal marine fish faunas. The species shows two resident (river-resident, lake-resident) and three main facultative migratory life histories (downstream-upstream within a river system, fluvial-adfluvial potamodromous; to and from a lake, lacustrine-adfluvial (inlet) or allacustrine (outlet) potamodromous; to and from the sea, anadromous). River-residency v. migration is a balance between enhanced feeding and thus growth advantages of migration to a particular habitat v. the costs of potentially greater mortality and energy expenditure. Fluvial-adfluvial migration usually has less feeding improvement, but less mortality risk, than lacustrine-adfluvial or allacustrine and anadromous, but the latter vary among catchments as to which is favoured. Indirect evidence suggests that around 50% of the variability in S. trutta migration v. residency, among individuals within a population, is due to genetic variance. This dichotomous decision can best be explained by the threshold-trait model of quantitative genetics. Thus, an individual's physiological condition (e.g., energy status) as regulated by environmental factors, genes and non-genetic parental effects, acts as the cue. The magnitude of this cue relative to a genetically predetermined individual threshold, governs whether it will migrate or sexually mature as a river-resident. This decision threshold occurs early in life and, if the choice is to migrate, a second threshold probably follows determining the age and timing of migration. Migration destination (mainstem river, lake, or sea) also appears to be genetically programmed. Decisions to migrate and ultimate destination result in a number of subsequent consequential changes such as parr-smolt transformation, sexual maturity and return migration. Strong associations with one or a few genes have been found for most aspects of the migratory syndrome and indirect evidence supports genetic involvement in all parts. Thus, migratory and resident life histories potentially evolve as a result of natural and anthropogenic environmental changes, which alter relative survival and reproduction. Knowledge of genetic determinants of the various components of migration in S. trutta lags substantially behind that of Oncorhynchus mykiss and other salmonines. Identification of genetic markers linked to migration components and especially to the migration-residency decision, is a prerequisite for facilitating detailed empirical studies. In order to predict effectively, through modelling, the effects of environmental changes, quantification of the relative fitness of different migratory traits and of their heritabilities, across a range of environmental conditions, is also urgently required in the face of the increasing pace of such changes.

Citing Articles

Psychoactive pollutant alters movement dynamics of fish in a natural lake system.

Brand J, Bertram M, Cerveny D, McCallum E, Hellstrom G, Michelangeli M Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2036):20241760.

PMID: 39657799 PMC: 11631415. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1760.


Whole-Genome Resequencing Reveals Polygenic Signatures of Directional and Balancing Selection on Alternative Migratory Life Histories.

Moran P, Colgan T, Phillips K, Coughlan J, McGinnity P, Reed T Mol Ecol. 2024; 33(23):e17538.

PMID: 39497337 PMC: 11589691. DOI: 10.1111/mec.17538.


Leveraging the genetic diversity of trout in the rivers of the British Isles and northern France to understand the movements of sea trout ( L.) around the English Channel.

King R, Ellis C, Bekkevold D, Ensing D, Lecointre T, Osmond D Evol Appl. 2024; 17(7):e13759.

PMID: 39040811 PMC: 11261213. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13759.


Local variation in stress response of juvenile anadromous brown trout, .

Berry M, Zena L, Roques J, Sandblom E, Thorstad E, Hojesjo J Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(6):e11526.

PMID: 38932968 PMC: 11199126. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11526.


Genetic consequences of improved river connectivity in brown trout ( L.).

Moccetti P, Dodd J, Joyce D, Nunn A, Gillespie B, Bolland J Evol Appl. 2024; 17(4):e13660.

PMID: 38617825 PMC: 11009428. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13660.


References
1.
Abadia-Cardoso A, Anderson E, Pearse D, Garza J . Large-scale parentage analysis reveals reproductive patterns and heritability of spawn timing in a hatchery population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Mol Ecol. 2013; 22(18):4733-46. DOI: 10.1111/mec.12426. View

2.
Peiman K, Birnie-Gauvin K, Midwood J, Larsen M, Wilson A, Aarestrup K . If and when: intrinsic differences and environmental stressors influence migration in brown trout (Salmo trutta). Oecologia. 2017; 184(2):375-384. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-017-3873-9. View

3.
Phillis C, Moore J, Buoro M, Hayes S, Garza J, Pearse D . Shifting Thresholds: Rapid Evolution of Migratory Life Histories in Steelhead/Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. J Hered. 2015; 107(1):51-60. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esv085. View

4.
Larsen P, Nielsen E, Koed A, Thomsen D, Olsvik P, Loeschcke V . Interpopulation differences in expression of candidate genes for salinity tolerance in winter migrating anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). BMC Genet. 2008; 9:12. PMC: 2254441. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-12. View

5.
Hecht B, Hard J, Thrower F, Nichols K . Quantitative genetics of migration-related traits in rainbow and steelhead trout. G3 (Bethesda). 2015; 5(5):873-89. PMC: 4426373. DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.016469. View