» Articles » PMID: 31190949

Combined EsophaCap Cytology and MUC2 Immunohistochemistry for Screening of Intestinal Metaplasia, Dysplasia and Carcinoma

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2019 Jun 14
PMID 31190949
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased by 700% in Western countries over the last 30 years. Although clinical guidelines call for endoscopic surveillance for EAC among high-risk populations, fewer than 5% of new EAC patients are under surveillance at the time of diagnosis. We studied the accuracy of combined cytopathology and MUC2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for screening of Intestinal Metaplasia (IM), dysplasia and EAC, using specimens collected from the EsophaCap swallowable encapsulated cytology sponge from Canada and United States. By comparing the EsophaCap cytological diagnosis with concurrent endoscopic biopsies performed on the same patients in 28 cases, we first built up the cytology diagnostic categories and criteria. Based on these criteria, 136 cases were evaluated by both cytology and MUC2 IHC with blinded to patient biopsy diagnosis. We first set up categories and criteria for cytological diagnosis of EscophaCap samples. Based on these, we divided our evaluated cytological samples into two groups: non-IM group and IM or dysplasia or adenocarcinoma group. Using the biopsy as our gold standard to screen IM, dysplasia and EAC by combined cytology and MUC2 IHC, the sensitivity and specificity were 68% and 91%, respectively, which is in the range of clinically useful cytological screening tests such as the cervical Pap smear. Combined EsophaCap cytology and MUC2 IHC could be a good screening test for IM and Beyond.

Citing Articles

The Aberrant Expression of Biomarkers and Risk Prediction for Neoplastic Changes in Barrett's Esophagus-Dysplasia.

Choi Y, Bedford A, Pollack S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001449 PMC: 11240336. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132386.


DNA methylation markers in esophageal cancer.

Xu Y, Wang Z, Pei B, Wang J, Xue Y, Zhao G Front Genet. 2024; 15:1354195.

PMID: 38774285 PMC: 11106492. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1354195.


New Techniques to Screen for Barrett Esophagus.

Strauss A, Falk G Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2023; 19(7):383-390.

PMID: 37771620 PMC: 10524417.


Nanofiber capsules for minimally invasive sampling of biological specimens from gastrointestinal tract.

John J, McCarthy A, Su Y, Ackerman D, Shahriar S, Carlson M Acta Biomater. 2022; 146:211-221.

PMID: 35513306 PMC: 9371944. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.045.


Novel Screening Alternatives for Barrett Esophagus.

Chandar A, Sharma A, Chak A Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2021; 16(5):238-245.

PMID: 34035726 PMC: 8132638.


References
1.
Leoni-Parvex S, Mihaescu A, Pellanda A, Monnier P, Bosman F . Esophageal cytology in the follow-up of patients with treated upper aerodigestive tract malignancies. Cancer. 2000; 90(1):10-6. View

2.
Montgomery E, Goldblum J, Greenson J, Haber M, Lamps L, Lauwers G . Dysplasia as a predictive marker for invasive carcinoma in Barrett esophagus: a follow-up study based on 138 cases from a diagnostic variability study. Hum Pathol. 2001; 32(4):379-88. DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2001.23511. View

3.
Dulai G, Guha S, Kahn K, Gornbein J, Weinstein W . Preoperative prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2002; 122(1):26-33. DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.30297. View

4.
Saad R, Mahood L, Clary K, Liu Y, Silverman J, Raab S . Role of cytology in the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus and associated neoplasia. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003; 29(3):130-5. DOI: 10.1002/dc.10334. View

5.
Rex D, Cummings O, Shaw M, Cumings M, Wong R, Vasudeva R . Screening for Barrett's esophagus in colonoscopy patients with and without heartburn. Gastroenterology. 2004; 125(6):1670-7. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.09.030. View