» Articles » PMID: 31165158

Comparative Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models and Projections for Future Risk Stratification

Abstract

Background: External validation of risk models is critical for risk-stratified breast cancer prevention. We used the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimation (iCARE) as a flexible tool for risk model development and comparative model validation and to make projections for population risk stratification.

Methods: Performance of two recently developed models, one based on the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium analysis (iCARE-BPC3) and another based on a literature review (iCARE-Lit), were compared with two established models (Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool and International Breast Cancer Intervention Study Model) based on classical risk factors in a UK-based cohort of 64 874 white non-Hispanic women (863 patients) age 35-74 years. Risk projections in a target population of US white non-Hispanic women age 50-70 years assessed potential improvements in risk stratification by adding mammographic breast density (MD) and polygenic risk score (PRS).

Results: The best calibrated models were iCARE-Lit (expected to observed number of cases [E/O] = 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87 to 1.11) for women younger than 50 years, and iCARE-BPC3 (E/O = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.09) for women 50 years or older. Risk projections using iCARE-BPC3 indicated classical risk factors can identify approximately 500 000 women at moderate to high risk (>3% 5-year risk) in the target population. Addition of MD and a 313-variant PRS is expected to increase this number to approximately 3.5 million women, and among them, approximately 153 000 are expected to develop invasive breast cancer within 5 years.

Conclusions: iCARE models based on classical risk factors perform similarly to or better than BCRAT or IBIS in white non-Hispanic women. Addition of MD and PRS can lead to substantial improvements in risk stratification. However, these integrated models require independent prospective validation before broad clinical applications.

Citing Articles

Investigating the added value of incorporatingmammographic density to an integrated breastcancer risk model with questionnaire-based riskfactors and polygenic risk score.

Mulder C, Yang X, Jee Y, Scott C, Gao C, Cao Y Res Sq. 2025; .

PMID: 39764121 PMC: 11702789. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5445786/v1.


Development of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Integrating Monogenic, Polygenic, and Epidemiologic Risk.

Kalia S, Boddicker N, Yadav S, Huang H, Na J, Hu C Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(11):1490-1499.

PMID: 39259185 PMC: 11530304. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0594.


Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Lifestyle and Reproductive Factors Associated with Risk of Breast Cancer in Asian Women.

Ang B, Teo S, Ho W Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(10):1273-1285.

PMID: 39018331 PMC: 7617425. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0005.


Wasm-iCARE: a portable and privacy-preserving web module to build, validate, and apply absolute risk models.

Balasubramanian J, Pal Choudhury P, Mukhopadhyay S, Ahearn T, Chatterjee N, Garcia-Closas M JAMIA Open. 2024; 7(2):ooae055.

PMID: 38938691 PMC: 11208928. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae055.


A constrained maximum likelihood approach to developing well-calibrated models for predicting binary outcomes.

Cao Y, Ma W, Zhao G, McCarthy A, Chen J Lifetime Data Anal. 2024; 30(3):624-648.

PMID: 38717617 PMC: 11634939. DOI: 10.1007/s10985-024-09628-9.


References
1.
van Veen E, Brentnall A, Byers H, Harkness E, Astley S, Sampson S . Use of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Mammographic Density Plus Classic Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction. JAMA Oncol. 2018; 4(4):476-482. PMC: 5885189. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4881. View

2.
Gail M, Brinton L, Byar D, Corle D, Green S, Schairer C . Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989; 81(24):1879-86. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879. View

3.
Pal Choudhury P, Maas P, Wilcox A, Wheeler W, Brook M, Check D . iCARE: An R package to build, validate and apply absolute risk models. PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0228198. PMC: 7001949. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228198. View

4.
Vachon C, Scott C, Tamimi R, Thompson D, Fasching P, Stone J . Joint association of mammographic density adjusted for age and body mass index and polygenic risk score with breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res. 2019; 21(1):68. PMC: 6532188. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-019-1138-8. View

5.
Collins G, de Groot J, Dutton S, Omar O, Shanyinde M, Tajar A . External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014; 14:40. PMC: 3999945. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-40. View