» Articles » PMID: 31157311

Topological Reinforcement As a Principle of Modularity Emergence in Brain Networks

Overview
Journal Netw Neurosci
Publisher MIT Press
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Jun 4
PMID 31157311
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Modularity is a ubiquitous topological feature of structural brain networks at various scales. Although a variety of potential mechanisms have been proposed, the fundamental principles by which modularity emerges in neural networks remain elusive. We tackle this question with a plasticity model of neural networks derived from a purely topological perspective. Our topological reinforcement model acts enhancing the topological overlap between nodes, that is, iteratively allowing connections between non-neighbor nodes with high neighborhood similarity. This rule reliably evolves synthetic random networks toward a modular architecture. Such final modular structure reflects initial "proto-modules," thus allowing to predict the modules of the evolved graph. Subsequently, we show that this topological selection principle might be biologically implemented as a Hebbian rule. Concretely, we explore a simple model of excitable dynamics, where the plasticity rule acts based on the functional connectivity (co-activations) between nodes. Results produced by the activity-based model are consistent with the ones from the purely topological rule in terms of the final network configuration and modules composition. Our findings suggest that the selective reinforcement of topological overlap may be a fundamental mechanism contributing to modularity emergence in brain networks.

Citing Articles

Competitive interactions shape brain dynamics and computation across species.

Luppi A, Sanz Perl Y, Vohryzek J, Mediano P, Rosas F, Milisav F bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39484469 PMC: 11526968. DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.19.619194.


Resting-state EEG dynamics help explain differences in response control in ADHD: Insight into electrophysiological mechanisms and sex differences.

Kember J, Stepien L, Panda E, Tekok-Kilic A PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0277382.

PMID: 37796795 PMC: 10553225. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277382.


The hidden community architecture of human brain networks.

Lee B, Kang U, Chang H, Cho K Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):3540.

PMID: 35241755 PMC: 8894465. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07570-0.


On the Importance of Being Flexible: Dynamic Brain Networks and Their Potential Functional Significances.

Safron A, Klimaj V, Hipolito I Front Syst Neurosci. 2022; 15:688424.

PMID: 35126062 PMC: 8814434. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.688424.


Two classes of functional connectivity in dynamical processes in networks.

Voutsa V, Battaglia D, Bracken L, Brovelli A, Costescu J, Diaz Munoz M J R Soc Interface. 2021; 18(183):20210486.

PMID: 34665977 PMC: 8526174. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0486.


References
1.
Kaiser M, Hilgetag C . Nonoptimal component placement, but short processing paths, due to long-distance projections in neural systems. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006; 2(7):e95. PMC: 1513269. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020095. View

2.
Muller-Linow M, Hilgetag C, Hutt M . Organization of excitable dynamics in hierarchical biological networks. PLoS Comput Biol. 2008; 4(9):e1000190. PMC: 2542420. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000190. View

3.
Reichardt J, Alamino R, Saad D . The interplay between microscopic and mesoscopic structures in complex networks. PLoS One. 2011; 6(8):e21282. PMC: 3148213. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021282. View

4.
Ravasz E, Somera A, Mongru D, Oltvai Z, Barabasi A . Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science. 2002; 297(5586):1551-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1073374. View

5.
Yuan W, Zhou C . Interplay between structure and dynamics in adaptive complex networks: emergence and amplification of modularity by adaptive dynamics. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011; 84(1 Pt 2):016116. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.016116. View