» Articles » PMID: 31144306

Children's and Adolescents' Evaluations of Intergroup Exclusion in Interracial and Interwealth Peer Contexts

Overview
Journal Child Dev
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2019 May 31
PMID 31144306
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Children and adolescents (N = 153, ages 8-14 years, M  = 11.46 years) predicted and evaluated peer exclusion in interwealth (high-wealth and low-wealth) and interracial (African American and European American) contexts. With age, participants increasingly expected high-wealth groups to be more exclusive than low-wealth groups, regardless of their depicted race. Furthermore, children evaluated interwealth exclusion less negatively than interracial exclusion, and children who identified as higher in wealth evaluated interwealth exclusion less negatively than did children who identified as lower in wealth. Children cited explicit negative stereotypes about high-wealth groups in their justifications, while rarely citing stereotypes about low-wealth groups or racial groups. Results revealed that both race and wealth are important factors that children consider when evaluating peer exclusion.

Citing Articles

Adolescents' evaluations of peer and teacher unfair treatment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics classes: Expected interventions.

Mulvey K, Cerda-Smith J, Herry E, Joy A, Marlow C, Mathews C J Res Adolesc. 2024; 34(4):1611-1625.

PMID: 39384695 PMC: 11606267. DOI: 10.1111/jora.13030.


The Role of SES in Preadolescence: Understandings and Group Evaluations based on Income, Education, and Occupation.

Boer I, Fleischmann F, Thijs J J Youth Adolesc. 2024; 53(10):2300-2319.

PMID: 38811476 PMC: 11413091. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-024-02018-2.


Children's and adolescents' evaluations of wealth-related STEM inequality.

McGuire L, Marlow C, Hoffman A, Joy A, Law F, Hartstone-Rose A Soc Dev. 2024; 33(1):e12710.

PMID: 38516637 PMC: 10952697. DOI: 10.1111/sode.12710.


Adolescents view social exclusion based on social class as more wrong than do children.

Gonul B, Sahin-Acar B, Killen M Dev Psychol. 2023; 59(9):1703-1715.

PMID: 37347893 PMC: 10527455. DOI: 10.1037/dev0001564.


Adolescents' Evaluations of those who Challenge Exclusive and Inclusive Peer Norms.

Hitti A, Killen M J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2023; 33(2):236-251.

PMID: 37193042 PMC: 10181805. DOI: 10.1002/casp.2638.


References
1.
Posada R, Wainryb C . Moral development in a violent society: Colombian children's judgments in the context of survival and revenge. Child Dev. 2008; 79(4):882-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01165.x. View

2.
Elenbaas L, Killen M . Age-Related Changes in Children's Associations of Economic Resources and Race. Front Psychol. 2016; 7:884. PMC: 4909738. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00884. View

3.
Goodman E, Maxwell S, Malspeis S, Adler N . Developmental Trajectories of Subjective Social Status. Pediatrics. 2015; 136(3):e633-40. PMC: 4552092. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-1300. View

4.
Flanagan C, Tucker C . Adolescents' explanations for political issues: concordance with their views of self and society. Dev Psychol. 1999; 35(5):1198-209. DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.35.5.1198. View

5.
Newheiser A, Dunham Y, Merrill A, Hoosain L, Olson K . Preference for high status predicts implicit outgroup bias among children from low-status groups. Dev Psychol. 2013; 50(4):1081-90. PMC: 3981896. DOI: 10.1037/a0035054. View