» Articles » PMID: 31131353

Advances in the Management of Acute Cholecystitis

Overview
Date 2019 May 28
PMID 31131353
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis (AC) continues to evolve. Among the most common surgically treated conditions in the USA, appropriate diagnosis and management of AC require astute clinical judgment and operative skill. Useful diagnostic and grading systems have been developed, most notably the Tokyo guidelines, but some recent clinical validation studies have questioned their generalizability to the US population. The timing of surgical intervention is another area that requires further investigation. US surgeons traditionally pursue laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for AC patients with symptoms onset <72 hours, but for patients with symptoms over 72 hours, surgeons often elect to treat the patients with antibiotics and delay LC for 4-6 weeks to permit the inflammation to subside. This practice has recently been called into question, as there are data suggesting that LC even for AC patients with over 72 hours of symptoms confers decreased morbidity, shorter length of stay, and reduced overall healthcare costs. Finally, the role of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) needs to be better defined. Traditional role of PC is a temporizing measure for patients who are poor surgical candidates. However, there are data suggesting that in AC patients with organ failure, PC patients suffered higher mortality and readmission rates when compared with a propensity-matched LC cohort. Beyond diagnosis, the surgical management of AC can be remarkably challenging. All surgeons need to be familiar with best-practice surgical techniques, adjunct intra-operative imaging, and bail-out options when performing LC.

Citing Articles

Letter to the Editor RE: "A bifid gallbladder? A challenging laparoscopic cholecystectomy".

Callender K Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 120:109900.

PMID: 38878732 PMC: 11226950. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109900.


The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review for a Practical Approach.

Mencarini L, Vestito A, Zagari R, Montagnani M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(9).

PMID: 38731224 PMC: 11084823. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092695.


Epidemiology and Outcomes of Symptomatic Cholelithiasis and Cholecystitis in the USA: Trends and Urban-Rural Variations.

Li S, Guizzetti L, Ma C, Shaheen A, Dixon E, Ball C J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 27(5):932-944.

PMID: 36720756 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05604-0.


The utility of the CADISS® system in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Malvaux P, Gherardi D, Gryspeerdt F, De Gheldere C Surg Endosc. 2022; 36(12):9462-9468.

PMID: 36319896 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09616-w.


Effect of timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on postoperative efficacy and rehabilitation of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.

Xu R, Xu Y, Xu R Am J Transl Res. 2022; 14(2):1107-1113.

PMID: 35273714 PMC: 8902523.


References
1.
Zafar S, Obirieze A, Adesibikan B, Cornwell 3rd E, Fullum T, Tran D . Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. JAMA Surg. 2014; 150(2):129-36. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2339. View

2.
Pesce A, Latteri S, Barchitta M, Portale T, Di Stefano B, Agodi A . Near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography - real-time visualization of the biliary tree during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2018; 20(6):538-545. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.11.013. View

3.
Joseph B, Jehan F, Dacey M, Kulvatunyou N, Khan M, Zeeshan M . Evaluating the Relevance of the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Cholecystitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2018; 227(1):38-43.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.02.016. View

4.
Csikesz N, Tseng J, Shah S . Trends in surgical management for acute cholecystitis. Surgery. 2008; 144(2):283-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.033. View

5.
Gibney E . Asymptomatic gallstones. Br J Surg. 1990; 77(4):368-72. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800770405. View