» Articles » PMID: 31131256

Modified American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System Based on the Node Ratio Can Further Improve the Capacity of Prognosis Assessment for Gastric Cancer Patients

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 May 28
PMID 31131256
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our aim was to investigate whether the modified American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system based on the node ratio can further improve the capacity of prognosis assessment for gastric cancer (GC) patients regardless of the number of lymph nodes examined (eLNs). A total of 17,187 GC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included. On the basis of a training set of 7,660 GC patients, we built the tumor-node ratio-metastasis (TNrM) staging system, which was then externally validated with a validation set of 9,527 GC patients. For the training set, the C-index value of the TNrM staging system was significantly higher than that of the AJCC 8th TNM staging system to predict survival for GC patients (C-index: 0.688 vs. 0.671, < 0.001). Moreover, the C-index value of the TNrM staging system was significantly higher than that of the 8th TNM staging system to predict survival for GC patients with ≤15 eLNs (C-index: 0.682 vs. 0.673, < 0.001), as well as for GC patients with >15 eLNs (C-index: 0.700 vs. 0.694, < 0.001). Similar results were found in the validation set. The TNrM staging system predicted survival more accurately and discriminatively than the AJCC 8th TNM staging system for GC patients regardless of the number of eLNs.

Citing Articles

Prognostic value of lymph node density on cancer staging system for gastric cancer without distal metastasis: a population-based analysis of SEER database.

Liu Y, Cui H, Xu X, Liang W World J Surg Oncol. 2022; 20(1):325.

PMID: 36175896 PMC: 9520926. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02795-9.


Revisiting the 8th AJCC system for gastric cancer: A review on validations, nomograms, lymph nodes impact, and proposed modifications.

Mranda G, Xue Y, Zhou X, Yu W, Wei T, Xiang Z Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 75:103411.

PMID: 35386808 PMC: 8977912. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103411.

References
1.
Ueno S, Tanabe G, Sako K, Hiwaki T, Hokotate H, Fukukura Y . Discrimination value of the new western prognostic system (CLIP score) for hepatocellular carcinoma in 662 Japanese patients. Cancer of the Liver Italian Program. Hepatology. 2001; 34(3):529-34. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.27219. View

2.
Camp R, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm D . X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10(21):7252-9. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0713. View

3.
Smith D, Schwarz R, Schwarz R . Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(28):7114-24. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.14.621. View

4.
Wu C, Hsiung C, Lo S, Hsieh M, Chen J, Li A . Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006; 7(4):309-15. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70623-4. View

5.
George S, Primrose J, Talbot R, Smith J, Mullee M, Bailey D . Will Rogers revisited: prospective observational study of survival of 3592 patients with colorectal cancer according to number of nodes examined by pathologists. Br J Cancer. 2006; 95(7):841-7. PMC: 2360535. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603352. View