» Articles » PMID: 36175896

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Density on Cancer Staging System for Gastric Cancer Without Distal Metastasis: a Population-based Analysis of SEER Database

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2022 Sep 29
PMID 36175896
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Accurate tumor staging is the cornerstone of tumor treatment. Current tumor staging system for gastric cancer (GC) is based on regional positive lymph nodes while ignoring the total number of examined lymph nodes. We aim to assess the prognostic value of lymph node density (LND), the ratio of positive nodes to the total number examined nodes, in GC without distal metastasis.

Methods: Clinical information of patients with histologically confirmed GC and without distal metastasis was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. The X-Tile software was used to identify the ideal prognosis-related cutoff point for LND. The prognostic value of LND on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed in Cox regression models. Subgroup analysis stratified by LND was performed on current lymph node staging system to further explore the interaction between LND and current lymph node staging system.

Results: A total of 4281 participants were identified from the SEER database for the final analysis. The optimal prognosis-related cutoff values of LND were calculated as 0.1 and 0.4, and LND was divided into three levels: LND1 (< 0.1), LND2 (> = 0.1, < 0.4), and LND3 (> = 0.4). LND3 was associated with worse CSS and OS in GC patients. Compared to patients with LND1, those with LND2 and LND3 had 2.43 (HR = 2.43, 95% CI 2.09-2.84, P < 0.001) and 4.69 (HR = 4.69, 95% CI 4.02-5.48, P < 0.001) folds increase in mortality in CSS, respectively. Similar results were found in the evaluation of OS in GC patients. Subgroup analysis stratified by LND also found that patients in the same current lymph node stage still had different prognosis due to the different LND levels after adjustment for other prognosis-related covariates (all P values < 0.001).

Conclusion: LND is an independent prognostic factor for GC without distal metastasis. In the current lymph node staging system, LND has potential value in further accurately classifying GC patients without distal metastasis.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the predictive performance of three lymph node staging systems for late-onset gastric cancer patients after surgery.

Chen S, Ding P, Zhao Q Front Surg. 2024; 11:1376702.

PMID: 38919979 PMC: 11196640. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1376702.


Combination of clinical and spectral-CT iodine concentration for predicting liver metastasis in gastric cancer: a preliminary study.

She Y, Liu X, Liu H, Yang H, Zhang W, Han Y Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(10):3438-3449.

PMID: 38744700 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04346-0.


Effect of the number of negative lymph nodes removed on the survival and recurrence rate after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Bahardoust M, Kheirabadi M, Donyadideh G, Khaleghian M, Haghmoradi M, TizMaghz A BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):246.

PMID: 37605178 PMC: 10441750. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02154-9.


Evaluation of the prognostic value of negative to positive lymph node ratio in gastric cancer: results from multi-institutional cohorts from western and eastern datasets - Cohort study.

Wang X, Wang P, Wang W, Sun Z, Wang Z, Zhang R Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023; 85(6):2348-2355.

PMID: 37363559 PMC: 10289599. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000775.


Positive lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients: Is it going to supersede positive lymph node number in guidelines?.

Capkinoglu E, Tufan A, Omeroglu S, Tanal M, Guven O, Demir U Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(20):e33757.

PMID: 37335735 PMC: 10194709. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033757.

References
1.
Biffi R, Botteri E, Cenciarelli S, Luca F, Pozzi S, Valvo M . Impact on survival of the number of lymph nodes removed in patients with node-negative gastric cancer submitted to extended lymph node dissection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011; 37(4):305-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.01.013. View

2.
Zhou Y, Yang L, Wang Z, He M, Yun J, Zhang D . Lymph node staging systems in patients with gastric cancer treated with D2 resection plus adjuvant chemotherapy. J Cancer. 2018; 9(4):660-666. PMC: 5858487. DOI: 10.7150/jca.22016. View

3.
Sacerdotianu V, Ungureanu B, Iordache S, Filip M, Pirici D, Liliac I . Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Gastric Cancer Staging. Curr Health Sci J. 2022; 48(1):88-94. PMC: 9289590. DOI: 10.12865/CHSJ.48.01.13. View

4.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

5.
Dicken B, Bigam D, Cass C, Mackey J, Joy A, Hamilton S . Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions. Ann Surg. 2004; 241(1):27-39. PMC: 1356843. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000149300.28588.23. View