» Articles » PMID: 31130770

Executive Functions and Response to Intervention: Identification of Students Struggling with Reading Comprehension

Overview
Journal Learn Disabil Q
Date 2019 May 28
PMID 31130770
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Inadequate responders demonstrate significant risk for learning disabilities. Previous investigations of the cognitive profiles of inadequate and adequate responders have not included measures of executive functions (EF), which have well-documented associations to reading comprehension. We evaluated EF performance on a common factor comprised of shared variance across tasks as well as five separable EF factors in the context of an intensive reading intervention for struggling fourth graders. To determine if EF performance at pretest is associated with subsequent responder status, we compared EF performance of three subgroups of students: inadequate and adequate responders and typical students not at-risk for reading disabilities. Results of discriminant function analyses and linear regression models comparing groups were largely null; EF performance at pretest demonstrated only small associations with responder status. These results suggest that the assessment of EF may have limited value in predicting which individual students will respond to intensive reading interventions.

Citing Articles

Relations Between Executive Functions and Reading Comprehension: A Study of Fourth-Grade Students with and Without Reading Comprehension Difficulties.

Escobar J, Espinoza V, Balboa S Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766373 PMC: 11674485. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121174.


The Brain's Control Networks in Reading: Insights From Cross-Task Studies of Youth.

Church J Mind Brain Educ. 2024; 17(4):257-266.

PMID: 38745918 PMC: 11091959. DOI: 10.1111/mbe.12372.


The reading-attention relationship: Variations in working memory network activity during single word decoding in children with and without dyslexia.

Sinha N, Nikki Arrington C, Malins J, Pugh K, Frijters J, Morris R Neuropsychologia. 2024; 195:108821.

PMID: 38340962 PMC: 11284775. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108821.


PROPERTIES OF A COMBINED MEASURE OF READING AND WRITING: THE ASSESSMENT OF WRITING, SELF-MONITORING, AND READING (AWSM READER).

Gioia A, Ahmed Y, Woods S, Cirino P Read Writ. 2023; 36(3):723-744.

PMID: 37124450 PMC: 10147347. DOI: 10.1007/s11145-022-10274-6.


Neurodevelopmental disorders: An innovative perspective the response to intervention model.

Rodriguez C, Areces D, Garcia T, Cueli M, Gonzalez-Castro P World J Psychiatry. 2021; 11(11):1017-1026.

PMID: 34888170 PMC: 8613753. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i11.1017.


References
1.
Hofmann W, Schmeichel B, Baddeley A . Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012; 16(3):174-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006. View

2.
Gerst E, Cirino P, Fletcher J, Yoshida H . [Formula: see text]Cognitive and behavioral rating measures of executive function as predictors of academic outcomes in children. Child Neuropsychol. 2015; 23(4):381-407. PMC: 4912460. DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2015.1120860. View

3.
Swanson J, Schuck S, Porter M, Carlson C, Hartman C, Sergeant J . Categorical and Dimensional Definitions and Evaluations of Symptoms of ADHD: History of the SNAP and the SWAN Rating Scales. Int J Educ Psychol Assess. 2015; 10(1):51-70. PMC: 4618695. View

4.
Jurado M, Rosselli M . The elusive nature of executive functions: a review of our current understanding. Neuropsychol Rev. 2007; 17(3):213-33. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-007-9040-z. View

5.
Diamond A, Lee K . Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science. 2011; 333(6045):959-64. PMC: 3159917. DOI: 10.1126/science.1204529. View