» Articles » PMID: 31129752

Hospital Stay for Temporary Stoma Closure is Shortened by C-reactive Protein Monitoring: a Prospective Case-matched Study

Overview
Date 2019 May 27
PMID 31129752
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) has been suggested as a satisfactory early marker of postoperative complications after colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a CRP monitoring-driven discharge strategy, after stoma reversal following laparoscopic sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer.

Methods: Eighty-eight patients who had stoma reversal between June 2016 and April 2018 had CRP serum level monitoring on postoperative day (POD) 3 and, if necessary, on POD5. Patients were discharged on POD4 if the CRP level was < 100 mg/L. Patients were matched [according to age, gender, body mass index, neoadjuvant pelvic irradiation, type of anastomosis (stapled or manual), and adjuvant chemotherapy] to 109 identical control patients who had stoma reversal between 2012 and 2016 with the same postoperative care but without CRP monitoring.

Results: Postoperative 30-day overall morbidity [CRP group: 12/88 (14%) vs controls: 11/109, (10%), p = 0.441] and severe morbidity rates (i.e. Dindo 3-4) [CRP group: 2/88 (2%) vs controls: 2/109 (2%), p = 0.838] were similar between groups. Mean length of stay was significantly shorter in the CRP group (CRP group: 4.6 ± 1.3 vs controls: 5.8 ± 1.8 days; p < 0.001). Discharge occurred before POD5 in 59/88 (67%) CRP patients vs 15/109 (14%) controls (p < 0.001). The unplanned rehospitalization rate [CRP group: 6/88 (7%) vs controls: 4/109 (4%), p = 0.347] was similar between groups.

Conclusions: In patients having temporary stoma closure after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer, postoperative CRP monitoring is associated with a significant shortening of hospital stay without increasing morbidity or rehospitalization rates.

References
1.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-13. PMC: 1360123. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. View

2.
Peeters K, Tollenaar R, Marijnen C, Kranenbarg E, Steup W, Wiggers T . Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2004; 92(2):211-6. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4806. View

3.
Yeh C, Changchien C, Wang J, Chen J, Chen H, Chiang J . Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg. 2004; 241(1):9-13. PMC: 1356840. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000150067.99651.6a. View

4.
Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K . Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg. 2005; 140(3):278-83, discussion 284. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.140.3.278. View

5.
Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R . Population-based study of risk factors for postoperative death after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg. 2006; 93(4):498-503. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5282. View