» Articles » PMID: 31122253

Interobserver Variability and Accuracy of P16/Ki-67 Dual Immunocytochemical Staining on Conventional Cervical Smears

Overview
Journal Diagn Pathol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Pathology
Date 2019 May 25
PMID 31122253
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: p16/Ki-67 dual immunocytochemical staining (DS) has been proven as a sensitive and specific test for triage of HPV positive women with good reproducibility and accuracy. However, implementation of the test into an organized screening program (OSP) is not easy. The aims of this study were to compare the performance and agreement of DS results among three Slovenian cytopathological laboratories involved in the national OSP, and to define cases where staining results can be difficult to interpret.

Methods: Cervical smears were obtained for DS from 129 women referred to colposcopy. Smears were evaluated blindly in three laboratories by a cytotechnologist and a cytopathologist after initial training. Results were positive, suspicious, negative or inadequate. Five characteristics of DS staining were recorded. After primary evaluation, an extensive expert-led additional training was undertaken, including a discussion of difficult cases and a practical exam. Smears were re-evaluated and results compared to primary evaluation.

Results: After the additional training, the overall percentage of agreement among the three laboratories increased from 77.5 to 89.9% and kappa increased from 0.70 to 0.86. Sensitivity for CIN2+ increased in two laboratories, to 90.5 and 85.7%, without the loss of specificity (75.8%). In one laboratory, the sensitivity slightly decreased from 90.5 to 88.9%, but the specificity increased from 63.6 to 68.2%. Difficult cases had significantly less DS cells, weak intensity of p16 staining, suboptimal cell morphology and background staining compared to positive cases.

Conclusion: Additional expert-led training and discussion of difficult cases are necessary for accurate interpretation of DS in laboratories involved in OSP. The most difficult cases were those with single stained cells and weak p16 staining. Training protocol for safe implementation of p16/Ki-67 DS in OSP is proposed.

Citing Articles

Classification of cervical biopsy free-text diagnoses through linear-classifier based natural language processing.

Hsu J, Christensen P, Ge Y, Long S J Pathol Inform. 2022; 13:100123.

PMID: 36268101 PMC: 9577054. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100123.


Correlation Analysis of Ultrasound Elastography Score with Invasive Breast Cancer and Biological Prognostic Factors.

Fu Q, Wan F, Lu Q, Shao W, Fu G, Wang Z Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022; 2022:1174541.

PMID: 35873667 PMC: 9273460. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1174541.


False Negative Results in Cervical Cancer Screening-Risks, Reasons and Implications for Clinical Practice and Public Health.

Macios A, Nowakowski A Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35741319 PMC: 9222017. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061508.


Diagnostic performance of p16/Ki-67 dual immunostaining at different number of positive cells in cervical smears in women referred for colposcopy.

Gajsek U, Dovnik A, Takac I, Ivanus U, Jerman T, Zatler S Radiol Oncol. 2021; 55(4):426-432.

PMID: 34821133 PMC: 8647795. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0043.


Novel biomarkers with promising benefits for diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: a systematic review.

George Onyango C, Ogonda L, Guyah B, Shiluli C, Ganda G, Orango O Infect Agent Cancer. 2020; 15(1):68.

PMID: 33292364 PMC: 7670699. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-020-00335-2.


References
1.
Hill A . THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?. Proc R Soc Med. 1965; 58:295-300. PMC: 1898525. DOI: 10.1177/003591576505800503. View

2.
Wentzensen N, Bergeron C, Cas F, Eschenbach D, Vinokurova S, von Knebel Doeberitz M . Evaluation of a nuclear score for p16INK4a-stained cervical squamous cells in liquid-based cytology samples. Cancer. 2005; 105(6):461-7. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21378. View

3.
Mandrekar J . Measures of interrater agreement. J Thorac Oncol. 2010; 6(1):6-7. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318200f983. View

4.
Ikenberg H, Bergeron C, Schmidt D, Griesser H, Alameda F, Angeloni C . Screening for cervical cancer precursors with p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology: results of the PALMS study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013; 105(20):1550-7. PMC: 3814411. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt235. View

5.
Wentzensen N, Fetterman B, Tokugawa D, Schiffman M, Castle P, Wood S . Interobserver reproducibility and accuracy of p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology in cervical cancer screening. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014; 122(12):914-20. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21473. View