Triaging HPV-positive Women with P16/Ki-67 Dual-stained Cytology: Results from a Sub-study Nested into the ATHENA Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: In addition to genotyping for HPV16/18, dual-immunostaining for p16/Ki-67 has shown promise as a triage of HPV-positive women. We assessed the performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology for triaging HPV-positive women undergoing primary HPV screening.
Methods: All women ≥25years with valid cervical biopsy and cobas® HPV Test results from the cross-sectional phase of ATHENA who were referred to colposcopy (n=7727) were eligible for enrolment. p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology was retrospectively performed on residual cytologic material collected into a second liquid-based cytology vial during the ATHENA enrolment visit. The diagnostic performance of dual-stained cytology, with or without HPV16/18 genotyping, for the detection of biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) was determined and compared to Pap cytology. Furthermore, the number of colposcopies required per CIN3+ detected was determined.
Results: Dual-stained cytology was significantly more sensitive than Pap cytology (74.9% vs. 51.9%; p<0.0001) for triaging HPV-positive women, whereas specificity was comparable (74.1% vs. 75.0%; p=0.3198). Referral of all HPV16/18 positive women combined with dual-stained cytology triage of women positive for 12 "other" HPV genotypes provided the highest sensitivity for CIN3+ (86.8%; 95% CI: 81.9-90.8). A similar strategy but using Pap cytology for the triage of women positive for 12 "other" HPV genotypes was less sensitive (78.2%; 95% CI: 72.5-83.2; p=0.0003), but required a similar number of colposcopies per CIN3+ detected.
Conclusions: p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology, either alone or combined with HPV16/18 genotyping, represents a promising approach as a sensitive and efficient triage for colposcopy of HPV-positive women when primary HPV screening is utilized.
Pruski D, Millert-Kalinska S, Lis A, Pelc E, Konopelski P, Jach R Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).
PMID: 39595932 PMC: 11594127. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252211863.
Mazurec K, Trzeszcz M, Mazurec M, Kobierzycki C, Jach R, Halon A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(19).
PMID: 39410021 PMC: 11476240. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193401.
Cubaka Ntamushigo J, Motshedisi Sebitloane H Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024; 168(2):428-435.
PMID: 39268663 PMC: 11726148. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15915.
Voidazan T, Budianu M, Cotoi O, Turdean S Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2024; 65(1):99-105.
PMID: 38527989 PMC: 11146556. DOI: 10.47162/RJME.65.1.12.
Ouh Y, Kim H, Yi K, Lee N, Kim H, Min K Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(4).
PMID: 38396493 PMC: 10888225. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040451.