» Articles » PMID: 31120511

Development of a Decision-making Checklist Tool to Support Technology Selection in Digital Health Research

Overview
Date 2019 May 24
PMID 31120511
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Digital technologies offer researchers new approaches to test personalized and adaptive health interventions tailored to an individual. Yet, research leveraging technologies to capture personal health data involve technical and ethical consideration during the study design phase. No guidance exists to facilitate responsible digital technology selection for research purposes. A stakeholder-engaged and iterative approach was used to develop, test, and refine a checklist designed to aid researchers in selecting technologies for their research. First, stakeholders (n = 7) discussed and informed key decision-making domains to guide app/device selection derived from the American Psychiatric Association's framework that included safety, evidence, usability, and interoperability. We added "ethical principles" to the APA's hierarchical model and created a checklist that was used by a small group of behavioral scientists (n = 7). Findings revealed the "ethical principles" domains of respect, beneficence, and justice cut across each decision-making domains and the checklist questions/prompts were revised accordingly and can be found at thecore.ucsd.edu. The refined checklist contains four decision-making domains with prompts/questions and ethical principles embedded within the domains of privacy, risk/benefit, data management, and access/evidence. This checklist is the first step in leading the narrative of decision-making when selecting digital health technologies for research. Given the dynamic and rapidly evolving nature of digital health technology use in research, this tool will need to be further evaluated for usefulness in technology selection.

Citing Articles

Mobility-Based Smartphone Digital Phenotypes for Unobtrusively Capturing Everyday Cognition, Mood, and Community Life-Space in Older Adults: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity Study.

Hackett K, Xu S, McKniff M, Paglia L, Barnett I, Giovannetti T JMIR Hum Factors. 2024; 11:e59974.

PMID: 39576984 PMC: 11624463. DOI: 10.2196/59974.


Design Approaches for Developing Quality Checklists in Healthcare Organizations: A Scoping Review.

Kwong E, Cole A, Sippo D, Yu F, Adapa K, Shea C medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39398986 PMC: 11469382. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.27.24314468.


Leveraging digital health technologies in heart failure self-care interventions to improve health equity.

Tunis R, West E, Clifford N, Horner S, Radhakrishnan K Nurs Outlook. 2024; 72(5):102225.

PMID: 38944905 PMC: 11490373. DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102225.


An overview of and recommendations for more accessible digital mental health services.

Lattie E, Stiles-Shields C, Graham A Nat Rev Psychol. 2024; 1(2):87-100.

PMID: 38515434 PMC: 10956902. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-021-00003-1.


The Digital Therapeutics Real-World Evidence Framework: An Approach for Guiding Evidence-Based Digital Therapeutics Design, Development, Testing, and Monitoring.

Kim M, Patrick K, Nebeker C, Godino J, Stein S, Klasnja P J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49208.

PMID: 38441954 PMC: 10951831. DOI: 10.2196/49208.


References
1.
Nebeker C, Murray K, Holub C, Haughton J, Arredondo E . Acceptance of Mobile Health in Communities Underrepresented in Biomedical Research: Barriers and Ethical Considerations for Scientists. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017; 5(6):e87. PMC: 5508114. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.6494. View

2.
Torous J, Chan S, Gipson S, Kim J, Nguyen T, Luo J . A Hierarchical Framework for Evaluation and Informed Decision Making Regarding Smartphone Apps for Clinical Care. Psychiatr Serv. 2018; 69(5):498-500. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700423. View

3.
Kramer D, Fu K . Cybersecurity Concerns and Medical Devices: Lessons From a Pacemaker Advisory. JAMA. 2017; 318(21):2077-2078. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.15692. View

4.
Nebeker C, Harlow J, Giacinto R, Orozco-Linares R, Bloss C, Weibel N . Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017; 8(4):266-276. DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1403980. View

5.
Huckvale K, Prieto J, Tilney M, Benghozi P, Car J . Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment. BMC Med. 2015; 13:214. PMC: 4582624. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0444-y. View