» Articles » PMID: 28179216

Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age: Introducing Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE), a Tool for Researchers and Institutional Review Boards

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2017 Feb 10
PMID 28179216
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research studies that leverage emerging technologies, such as passive sensing devices and mobile apps, have demonstrated encouraging potential with respect to favorably influencing the human condition. As a result, the nascent fields of mHealth and digital medicine have gained traction over the past decade as demonstrated in the United States by increased federal funding for research that cuts across a broad spectrum of health conditions. The existence of mHealth and digital medicine also introduced new ethical and regulatory challenges that both institutional review boards (IRBs) and researchers are struggling to navigate. In response, the Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE) initiative was launched. The CORE initiative has employed a participatory research approach, whereby researchers and IRB affiliates are involved in identifying the priorities and functionality of a shared resource. The overarching goal of CORE is to develop dynamic and relevant ethical practices to guide mHealth and digital medicine research. In this Viewpoint paper, we describe the CORE initiative and call for readers to join the CORE Network and contribute to the bigger conversation on ethics in the digital age.

Citing Articles

Investigating Smartphone-Based Sensing Features for Depression Severity Prediction: Observation Study.

Terhorst Y, Messner E, Opoku Asare K, Montag C, Kannen C, Baumeister H J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e55308.

PMID: 39883512 PMC: 11826944. DOI: 10.2196/55308.


Expanding a Behavioral View on Digital Health Access: Drivers and Strategies to Promote Equity.

Kepper M, Fowler L, Kusters I, Davis J, Baqer M, Sagui-Henson S J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e51355.

PMID: 39088246 PMC: 11327633. DOI: 10.2196/51355.


A Simple and Systematic Approach to Qualitative Data Extraction From Social Media for Novice Health Care Researchers: Tutorial.

Pretorius K JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e54407.

PMID: 38980712 PMC: 11267115. DOI: 10.2196/54407.


Does an App a Day Keep the Doctor Away? AI Symptom Checker Applications, Entrenched Bias, and Professional Responsibility.

Zawati M, Lang M J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50344.

PMID: 38838309 PMC: 11187504. DOI: 10.2196/50344.


Navigating ethical challenges in psychological research involving digital remote technologies and people who use alcohol or drugs.

Roberts W, McKee S, Miranda R, Barnett N Am Psychol. 2024; 79(1):24-38.

PMID: 38236213 PMC: 10798215. DOI: 10.1037/amp0001193.


References
1.
Torous J, Keshavan M, Gutheil T . Promise and perils of digital psychiatry. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014; 10:120-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.06.006. View

2.
Pisani A, Wyman P, Mohr D, Perrino T, Gallo C, Villamar J . Human Subjects Protection and Technology in Prevention Science: Selected Opportunities and Challenges. Prev Sci. 2016; 17(6):765-78. PMC: 4938846. DOI: 10.1007/s11121-016-0664-1. View

3.
Torous J, Roberts L . The Ethical Use of Mobile Health Technology in Clinical Psychiatry. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016; 205(1):4-8. DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000596. View

4.
Huckvale K, Prieto J, Tilney M, Benghozi P, Car J . Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment. BMC Med. 2015; 13:214. PMC: 4582624. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0444-y. View

5.
Bloss C, Nebeker C, Bietz M, Bae D, Bigby B, Devereaux M . Reimagining Human Research Protections for 21st Century Science. J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18(12):e329. PMC: 5216254. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6634. View