» Articles » PMID: 31117814

Excess Mortality Associated With Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation Complicating Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 2019 May 24
PMID 31117814
Citations 104
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) is common in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and mostly consequent to pulmonary hypertension. However, the intrinsic clinical implications of FTR are not fully understood.

Methods: The cohort of all Mayo Clinic patients from 2003 to 2011 diagnosed with heart failure stage B-C and ejection fraction<50%, with FTR grading and systolic pulmonary artery pressure estimation by Doppler echocardiography was identified and outcomes were analyzed. Patients with pacemakers/defibrillators, organic valve disease, or previous valve surgery were excluded. The primary outcome measure was overall mortality (censored at implantation of a defibrillator, ventricular assist device, or cardiac transplantation), adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic associates with mortality and major comorbidities.

Results: Among 13 026 patients meeting inclusion criteria, FTR was detected in 88% (N=11 507: 33% trivial, 32% mild, 17% moderate, and 6% severe), aged 68±14 years, 35% women, ejection fraction 36±10%, systolic pulmonary artery pressure 41±14 mm Hg with 20% atrial fibrillation. Covariates independently associated with FTR included elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure, older age, female sex, lower ejection fraction, mitral regurgitation, and atrial fibrillation (all P<0.0001). FTR was independently associated with more dyspnea, impaired kidney function, and lower cardiac output ( P<0.003 for all). For long-term outcome, higher FTR degree compared with trivial tricuspid regurgitation was independently associated with higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratios 1.09 [1.01-1.17] for mild FTR, 1.21 [1.11-1.33] for moderate FTR and 1.57 [1.39-1.78] for severe FTR); hence, 5-year survival was substantially lower with increasing severity of functional FTR, 68±1% for trivial FTR, 58±2% for mild FTR, 45±2% for moderate FTR, and 34±4% for severe FTR.

Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, FTR was common and independently associated with pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and more severe heart failure presentation. Long-term, higher FTR severity is associated with considerably worse survival, independently of baseline characteristics. Given these untoward outcomes associated with FTR in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, clinical trials should be directed at testing FTR treatment.

Citing Articles

Assessment of the GLIDE Score for Prediction of Mild Tricuspid Regurgitation following Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

Rudolph F, Narang A, Korber M, Friedrichs K, Kirchner J, Ivannikova M JACC Adv. 2025; 4(2):101523.

PMID: 40021274 PMC: 11905155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101523.


Prognostic implication of right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling in valvular heart disease.

Wu Z, Xie M, Zhang L, He Q, Gao L, Ji M Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 11:1504063.

PMID: 39877024 PMC: 11772282. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1504063.


Atrial Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management Strategies.

Mohyeldin M, Abdelghafar A, Allu S, Shrivastava S, Mustafa A, Mohamed F Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025; 25(12):435.

PMID: 39742228 PMC: 11683701. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2512435.


Transcatheter Tricuspid Regurgitation Repair-An Overview of Techniques and Eligible Patient Selection.

Mustafa E, Marinescu D, Florescu C, Donoiu I, Istratoaie O J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598020 PMC: 11594685. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226876.


Bibliometric analysis of imaging and treatment strategies for severe tricuspid regurgitation from 2015 to 2023.

Schlegl J, Bannehr M, Kucken T, Jankowska P, Neuss M, Lichtenauer M Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1444466.

PMID: 39534496 PMC: 11554479. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1444466.