» Articles » PMID: 31110921

Genome-wide Identification and Expression Profile Analysis of the Gene Family in Barley ( L.)

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2019 May 22
PMID 31110921
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In plants, heat shock proteins (Hsps) play important roles in response to diverse stresses. Hsp20 is the major family of Hsps, but their role remains poorly understood in barley ( L.). To reveal the mechanisms of barley Hsp20s () response to stress conditions, we performed a comprehensive genome-wide analysis of the gene family using bioinformatics-based methods. In total, 38 putative were identified in barley and grouped into four subfamilies (C, CP, PX, and MT) based on predicted subcellular localization and their phylogenetic relationships. A sequence analysis indicated that most genes have no intron or one with a relatively short length. In addition, the same group of HvHsp20 proteins in the phylogenetic tree shared similar gene structure and motifs, indicating that they were highly conserved and might have similar function. Based on RNA-seq data analysis, we showed that the transcript levels of genes could be induced largely by abiotic and biotic stresses such as heat, salt, and powdery mildew. Three genes, , , and , were up-regulated under biotic and abiotic stresses, suggesting their potential roles in mediating the response of barley plants to environment stresses. These results provide valuable information for further understanding the complex mechanisms of gene family in barley.

Citing Articles

Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the SPL gene family and its response to abiotic stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

He A, Zhou H, Ma C, Bai Q, Yang H, Yao X BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):846.

PMID: 39251952 PMC: 11384689. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10773-6.


Genome-wide profile analysis of the Hsp20 family in lettuce and identification of its response to drought stress.

Zhang Q, Dai B, Fan M, Yang L, Li C, Hou G Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1426719.

PMID: 39070912 PMC: 11272627. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1426719.


Genome-wide identification of the Q-type C2H2 zinc finger protein gene family and expression analysis under abiotic stress in lotus (Nelumbo nucifera G.).

Liu H, Liu Y, Liu F, Zeng L, Xu Y, Jin Q BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):648.

PMID: 38943098 PMC: 11214253. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10546-1.


Plant biomarkers as early detection tools in stress management in food crops: a review.

Aina O, Bakare O, Fadaka A, Keyster M, Klein A Planta. 2024; 259(3):60.

PMID: 38311674 PMC: 10838863. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-024-04333-1.


Global transcriptome profiling reveals root- and leaf-specific responses of barley ( L.) to HO.

Bhattacharyya S, Giridhar M, Meier B, Peiter E, Vothknecht U, Chigri F Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1223778.

PMID: 37771486 PMC: 10523330. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1223778.


References
1.
Mattick J, Gagen M . The evolution of controlled multitasked gene networks: the role of introns and other noncoding RNAs in the development of complex organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 2001; 18(9):1611-30. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003951. View

2.
Scharf K, Siddique M, Vierling E . The expanding family of Arabidopsis thaliana small heat stress proteins and a new family of proteins containing alpha-crystallin domains (Acd proteins). Cell Stress Chaperones. 2001; 6(3):225-37. PMC: 434404. DOI: 10.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0225:tefoat>2.0.co;2. View

3.
Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y . PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 30(1):325-7. PMC: 99092. DOI: 10.1093/nar/30.1.325. View

4.
Sun W, Van Montagu M, Verbruggen N . Small heat shock proteins and stress tolerance in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002; 1577(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-4781(02)00417-7. View

5.
Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A . Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004; 9(5):244-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006. View