» Articles » PMID: 31104128

Plasticity Leading to Cerebellum-dependent Learning: Two Different Regions, Two Different Types

Overview
Journal Pflugers Arch
Specialty Physiology
Date 2019 May 20
PMID 31104128
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In memory research, studying cerebellum-dependent memory is advantageous due to its relatively simple neural architecture compared with that of other memory circuits. To understand how cerebellum-dependent memory develops and is stored in this circuit, numerous hypotheses have been proposed. These hypotheses are generally able to adequately explain most learning and memory processes; however, several reported results are still poorly understood. Recently, the importance of intrinsic plasticity (i.e., plasticity of intrinsic excitability) has been highlighted in several studies. Because the classical view of cerebellum-dependent eye movement learning was focused on synaptic plasticity, it is valuable to consider the intrinsic plasticity for deeper understanding. In the present review, we re-examine the utility and limitations of previous hypotheses, from classic to recent, and propose an updated hypothesis. Integrating intrinsic plasticity into current models of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) circuit may facilitate deeper understanding of the VOR adaptation process. In particular, during the period of memory transfer, dynamic changes in excitability in both cerebellar Purkinje cells and vestibular nuclear neurons illuminate the role of intrinsic plasticity in the circuit.

Citing Articles

The Role of Cerebellar Intrinsic Neuronal Excitability, Synaptic Plasticity, and Perineuronal Nets in Eyeblink Conditioning.

Schreurs B, ODell D, Wang D Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38534469 PMC: 10968667. DOI: 10.3390/biology13030200.


Intrinsic plasticity of Purkinje cell serves homeostatic regulation of fear memory.

Lee J, Kim S, Jang D, Jang M, Bak M, Shim H Mol Psychiatry. 2023; 29(2):247-256.

PMID: 38017229 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02320-8.


Dynamic alteration of intrinsic properties of the cerebellar Purkinje cell during the motor memory consolidation.

Jang D, Chung G, Kim S, Kim S Mol Brain. 2023; 16(1):58.

PMID: 37430311 PMC: 10334628. DOI: 10.1186/s13041-023-01043-9.


mGluR1 Regulates the Interspike Interval Threshold for Dendritic Ca Transients in the Cerebellar Purkinje Cells.

Jang D, Ryu C, Chung G, Kim S, Kim S Exp Neurobiol. 2023; 32(2):83-90.

PMID: 37164648 PMC: 10175955. DOI: 10.5607/en22040.


New prospects on cerebellar reserve: Remarks on neuroprotective effects of experience in animals and humans.

Gelfo F, Serra L, Petrosini L Front Syst Neurosci. 2023; 16:1088587.

PMID: 36685287 PMC: 9854258. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.1088587.


References
1.
Boyden E, Katoh A, Pyle J, Chatila T, Tsien R, Raymond J . Selective engagement of plasticity mechanisms for motor memory storage. Neuron. 2006; 51(6):823-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.026. View

2.
Kellett D, Fukunaga I, Chen-Kubota E, Dean P, Yeo C . Memory consolidation in the cerebellar cortex. PLoS One. 2010; 5(7):e11737. PMC: 2912226. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011737. View

3.
Schreurs B, Gusev P, Tomsic D, Alkon D, Shi T . Intracellular correlates of acquisition and long-term memory of classical conditioning in Purkinje cell dendrites in slices of rabbit cerebellar lobule HVI. J Neurosci. 1998; 18(14):5498-507. PMC: 6793470. View

4.
Ohtsuki G, Hansel C . Synaptic Potential and Plasticity of an SK2 Channel Gate Regulate Spike Burst Activity in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells. iScience. 2018; 1:49-54. PMC: 5993052. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.02.001. View

5.
Ito M . Neural design of the cerebellar motor control system. Brain Res. 1972; 40(1):81-4. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90110-2. View