» Articles » PMID: 20686596

Memory Consolidation in the Cerebellar Cortex

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2010 Aug 6
PMID 20686596
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several forms of learning, including classical conditioning of the eyeblink, depend upon the cerebellum. In examining mechanisms of eyeblink conditioning in rabbits, reversible inactivations of the control circuitry have begun to dissociate aspects of cerebellar cortical and nuclear function in memory consolidation. It was previously shown that post-training cerebellar cortical, but not nuclear, inactivations with the GABAA agonist muscimol prevented consolidation but these findings left open the question as to how final memory storage was partitioned across cortical and nuclear levels. Memory consolidation might be essentially cortical and directly disturbed by actions of the muscimol, or it might be nuclear, and sensitive to the raised excitability of the nuclear neurons following the loss of cortical inhibition. To resolve this question, we simultaneously inactivated cerebellar cortical lobule HVI and the anterior interpositus nucleus of rabbits during the post-training period, so protecting the nuclei from disinhibitory effects of cortical inactivation. Consolidation was impaired by these simultaneous inactivations. Because direct application of muscimol to the nuclei alone has no impact upon consolidation, we can conclude that post-training, consolidation processes and memory storage for eyeblink conditioning have critical cerebellar cortical components. The findings are consistent with a recent model that suggests the distribution of learning-related plasticity across cortical and nuclear levels is task-dependent. There can be transfer to nuclear or brainstem levels for control of high-frequency responses but learning with lower frequency response components, such as in eyeblink conditioning, remains mainly dependent upon cortical memory storage.

Citing Articles

Delay eyeblink conditioning performance and brain-wide c-Fos expression in male and female mice.

Oyaga M, Serra I, Kurup D, Koekkoek S, Badura A Open Biol. 2023; 13(5):220121.

PMID: 37161289 PMC: 10170203. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.220121.


The computational neurology of movement under active inference.

Parr T, Limanowski J, Rawji V, Friston K Brain. 2021; 144(6):1799-1818.

PMID: 33704439 PMC: 8320263. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab085.


The Concept of Transmission Coefficient Among Different Cerebellar Layers: A Computational Tool for Analyzing Motor Learning.

Solouki S, Bahrami F, Janahmadi M Front Neural Circuits. 2019; 13:54.

PMID: 31507382 PMC: 6718712. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2019.00054.


Plasticity leading to cerebellum-dependent learning: two different regions, two different types.

Jang D, Kim S Pflugers Arch. 2019; 471(7):927-934.

PMID: 31104128 DOI: 10.1007/s00424-019-02282-3.


Grouping subjects based on conditioning criteria reveals differences in acquisition rates and in strength of conditioning-specific reflex modification.

Smith-Bell C, Schreurs B Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017; 145:172-180.

PMID: 29031809 PMC: 6613373. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.10.004.


References
1.
Pugh J, Raman I . Potentiation of mossy fiber EPSCs in the cerebellar nuclei by NMDA receptor activation followed by postinhibitory rebound current. Neuron. 2006; 51(1):113-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.021. View

2.
Raymond J, Lisberger S . Behavioral analysis of signals that guide learned changes in the amplitude and dynamics of the vestibulo-ocular reflex. J Neurosci. 1996; 16(23):7791-802. PMC: 6579103. View

3.
Bracha V, Zbarska S, Parker K, Carrel A, Zenitsky G, Bloedel J . The cerebellum and eye-blink conditioning: learning versus network performance hypotheses. Neuroscience. 2009; 162(3):787-96. PMC: 2822538. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.042. View

4.
Attwell P, Cooke S, Yeo C . Cerebellar function in consolidation of a motor memory. Neuron. 2002; 34(6):1011-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00719-5. View

5.
Yeo C, Hardiman M . Cerebellar cortex and eyeblink conditioning: a reexamination. Exp Brain Res. 1992; 88(3):623-38. DOI: 10.1007/BF00228191. View