» Articles » PMID: 31065167

Incorporating ACPE Standards in a Holistic Approach to School Operations and Accreditation

Overview
Journal Am J Pharm Educ
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2019 May 9
PMID 31065167
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy (AUHSOP) implemented a comprehensive, holistic process of continuous quality improvement (CQI) for its program using the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's (ACPE) Accreditation Standards as the foundation. The process served as a way to increase the impact of the accreditation standards through continuous monitoring and programmatic improvements. Internally generated standards were also included in the CQI process. Design of the program included defining the program, establishing quality criteria, developing a table of measures that provided evaluation metrics, and assessing the program annually. Each year, faculty members, staff, students and other constituents assess the program for strengths, areas for improvement and insights. A CQI report is created and is made available to constituents, including ACPE through the Assessment and Management System (AAMS). Areas for improvement and new goals are then incorporated into the school's strategic plan and committee assignments for the year. Some of the suggestions included making the program appraisal more meaningful and on a continuous, ongoing basis compared to doing an appraisal for accreditation purposes at 8-year intervals. The process has increased constituent awareness of all aspects of the program and prompted numerous improvements since its adoption. A culture of assessment resulted from the process.

Citing Articles

Use of Team-Based Learning Pedagogy to Prepare for a Pharmacy School Accreditation Self-Study.

Vinall R, Malhotra A, Puglisi J Pharmacy (Basel). 2021; 9(3).

PMID: 34564555 PMC: 8482079. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy9030148.

References
1.
Blouin D, Tekian A . Accreditation of Medical Education Programs: Moving From Student Outcomes to Continuous Quality Improvement Measures. Acad Med. 2017; 93(3):377-383. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001835. View

2.
Timpe E, Gupchup G, Scott V, Cobb D . Incorporating a continuous quality improvement process into pharmacy accreditation for well-established programs. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012; 76(3):38. PMC: 3327236. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe76338. View

3.
Shroyer A, Lu W, Chandran L . Drivers of Dashboard Development (3-D): A Curricular Continuous Quality Improvement Approach. Acad Med. 2016; 91(4):517-21. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001078. View

4.
Yearwood E, Singleton J, Feldman H, Colombraro G . A case study in implementing CQI in a nursing education program. J Prof Nurs. 2001; 17(6):297-304. DOI: 10.1053/jpnu.2001.28187. View

5.
Barzansky B, Hunt D, Moineau G, Ahn D, Lai C, Humphrey H . Continuous quality improvement in an accreditation system for undergraduate medical education: Benefits and challenges. Med Teach. 2015; 37(11):1032-8. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1031735. View