» Articles » PMID: 31064080

Four Virtual-Reality Simulators for Diagnostic Abdominal Ultrasound Training in Radiology

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 May 9
PMID 31064080
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ultrasound exams need skilled examiners, and simulation-based training could provide standardized and safe skill training. This study aims to give an overview of different types of virtual-reality simulators for use in abdominal diagnostic ultrasound training in radiology. Fifteen specialized radiologists and radiological residents were presented with two similar cases on four different simulators for abdominal ultrasound training. A feedback sheet for each individual simulator and for an overall comparison was filled out by all participants. All means of scores were compared, and simulators were ranked from least to most favorable. One simulator was ranked most favorable in seven out of nine questions, but none of the mean scores had statistically significant differences. All simulators were recommended for training radiologists, and all simulators were perceived to benefit trainees more than experienced ultra-sonographers.

Citing Articles

Simulator training in focus assessed transthoracic echocardiography (FATE) for undergraduate medical students: results from the FateSim randomized controlled trial.

Weimer J, Sprengart F, Vieth T, Gobel S, Dionysopoulou A, Kruger R BMC Med Educ. 2025; 25(1):21.

PMID: 39755639 PMC: 11699650. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06564-y.


Advancing radiology education for medical students: leveraging digital tools and resources.

Stirrat T, Martin R, Umair M, Waller J Pol J Radiol. 2024; 89:e508-e516.

PMID: 39507889 PMC: 11538907. DOI: 10.5114/pjr/193518.


Four different models for simulation-based training of bronchoscopic procedures.

Kronborg S, Karbing D, Arshad A, Lundgaard A BMC Pulm Med. 2024; 24(1):23.

PMID: 38195463 PMC: 10777524. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-02846-9.


Hands-On Time in Simulation-Based Ultrasound Training - A Dose-Related Response Study.

Mahmood O, Jorgensen R, Nielsen K, Konge L, Russell L Ultrasound Int Open. 2022; 8(1):E2-E6.

PMID: 35520372 PMC: 9064453. DOI: 10.1055/a-1795-5138.


Virtual Reality visualization for computerized COVID-19 lesion segmentation and interpretation.

Oulefki A, Agaian S, Trongtirakul T, Benbelkacem S, Aouam D, Zenati-Henda N Biomed Signal Process Control. 2021; 73:103371.

PMID: 34840591 PMC: 8610934. DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103371.


References
1.
. Minimum training recommendations for the practice of medical ultrasound. Ultraschall Med. 2006; 27(1):79-105. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-933605. View

2.
Moore C, Copel J . Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(8):749-57. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra0909487. View

3.
Motola I, Devine L, Chung H, Sullivan J, Issenberg S . Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach. 2013; 35(10):e1511-30. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632. View

4.
Konge L, Albrecht-Beste E, Nielsen M . Virtual-reality simulation-based training in ultrasound. Ultraschall Med. 2014; 35(2):95-7. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1366191. View

5.
Konge L, Ringsted C, Bjerrum F, Tolsgaard M, Bitsch M, Sorensen J . The Simulation Centre at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. J Surg Educ. 2015; 72(2):362-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.11.012. View