» Articles » PMID: 35520372

Hands-On Time in Simulation-Based Ultrasound Training - A Dose-Related Response Study

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2022 May 6
PMID 35520372
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used, but the sensitivity and specificity of the findings are highly user-dependent. There are many different approaches to ultrasound training. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of hands-on practice when learning POCUS. Junior doctors with no or limited ultrasound experience were included in the study and divided into three groups. They all completed a Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) course with different amounts of hands-on practice: 40 minutes (n=67), 60 minutes (n=12), and 90 minutes of hands-on time (n=27). By the end of the course, they all completed a previously validated test. More hands-on time improved the mean test scores and decreased the test time. The scores of the 40-, 60-, and 90-minute groups were 11.6 (SD 2.1), 12.8 (SD 2.5), and 13.7 (SD 2.5), respectively (p<0.001). The 90-minute group completed the test significantly faster than the other two groups (20 versus 26 minutes, p=0.003). A large inter-individual variation was seen. The necessary amount of hands-on training is unknown. This study demonstrates that performance increases with prolonged hands-on time but the inter-individual variation among trainees is very large, thereby making it impossible to define the "optimal" time. This supports the use of the concept of mastery learning where each individual trainee can continue training until proficiency is reached.

Citing Articles

Evidence-based training and certification: the ERS thoracic ultrasound training programme.

Pietersen P, Bhatnagar R, Rahman N, Maskell N, Wrightson J, Annema J Breathe (Sheff). 2023; 19(2):230053.

PMID: 37492346 PMC: 10365077. DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0053-2023.

References
1.
Tolsgaard M, Ringsted C, Dreisler E, Norgaard L, Petersen J, Madsen M . Sustained effect of simulation-based ultrasound training on clinical performance: a randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 46(3):312-8. PMC: 4600230. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14780. View

2.
Tolsgaard M, Rasmussen M, Tappert C, Sundler M, Sorensen J, Ottesen B . Which factors are associated with trainees' confidence in performing obstetric and gynecological ultrasound examinations?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 43(4):444-51. DOI: 10.1002/uog.13211. View

3.
Shackford S, Rogers F, Osler T, Trabulsy M, Clauss D, Vane D . Focused abdominal sonogram for trauma: the learning curve of nonradiologist clinicians in detecting hemoperitoneum. J Trauma. 1999; 46(4):553-62; discussion 562-4. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00003. View

4.
Tripu R, Lauerman M, Haase D, Fatima S, Glaser J, Cardarelli C . Graduating Surgical Residents Lack Competence in Critical Care Ultrasound. J Surg Educ. 2017; 75(3):582-588. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.022. View

5.
Russell L, Ostergaard M, Nielsen M, Konge L, Nielsen K . Standardised assessment of competence in Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018; 62(8):1154-1160. DOI: 10.1111/aas.13141. View