» Articles » PMID: 31063229

What Works? the Influence of Changing Wastewater Treatment Type, Including Tertiary Granular Activated Charcoal, on Downstream Macroinvertebrate Biodiversity Over Time

Overview
Date 2019 May 8
PMID 31063229
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study reviewed the impacts of wastewater on macroinvertebrates over 4 decades in a United Kingdom lowland river. This involved examining changes in chemicals, temperature, flow, and macroinvertebrate diversity from the 1970s until 2017 for a wastewater-dominated river downstream of Swindon in the United Kingdom (population ~ 220 000). When the wastewater treatment process changed from trickling filter to activated sludge in 1991, biological oxygen demand was nearly halved (90th percentile from 8.1 to 4.6 mg/L), ammonia peaks dropped more than 7-fold (90th percentile from 3.9 to 0.53 mg/L), whereas dissolved oxygen climbed consistently above 60% saturation (10th percentile from 49 to 64%) at a sampling point 2 km downstream of the wastewater treatment plant. A sustained increase in the number of macroinvertebrate species was evident from that point. River flow did not change, temperature rose slightly, and the major metal concentrations declined steadily over most of the monitoring period. Neither the introduction of phosphate stripping in 1999 nor the use of tertiary granular activated charcoal from 2008 to 2014 had strong positive effects on subsequent macroinvertebrate diversity. That the diversity still had not reached the ideal status by 2016 may be related to the modest habitat quality, agricultural pesticides, and limited recolonization potential in the catchment. The results indicate that urban wastewaters, with their chemical pollutants, are today probably not the biggest threat to the macroinvertebrate diversity of multiply stressed lowland rivers in the United Kingdom. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:1820-1832. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.

Citing Articles

Zinc and Copper Have the Greatest Relative Importance for River Macroinvertebrate Richness at a National Scale.

Johnson A, Sadykova D, Qu Y, Keller V, Bachiller-Jareno N, Jurgens M Environ Sci Technol. 2025; 59(8):4068-4079.

PMID: 39961329 PMC: 11883809. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c06849.


Assessing the impact of organic and inorganic micropollutants released from a wastewater treatment plant on humans and aquatic environment, Al-Hoceima city, Morocco.

El Hammoudani Y, Haboubi K, Bourjila A, Achoukhi I, Benaissa C, Faiz H Toxicol Rep. 2024; 13:101699.

PMID: 39156494 PMC: 11326954. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101699.

References
1.
Pottinger T, Henrys P, Williams R, Matthiessen P . The stress response of three-spined sticklebacks is modified in proportion to effluent exposure downstream of wastewater treatment works. Aquat Toxicol. 2012; 126:382-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.09.002. View

2.
Posthuma L, Dyer S, de Zwart D, Kapo K, Holmes C, Burton Jr G . Eco-epidemiology of aquatic ecosystems: Separating chemicals from multiple stressors. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 573:1303-1319. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.242. View

3.
Balaam J, Grover D, Johnson A, Jurgens M, Readman J, Smith A . The use of modelling to predict levels of estrogens in a river catchment: how does modelled data compare with chemical analysis and in vitro yeast assay results?. Sci Total Environ. 2010; 408(20):4826-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.019. View

4.
von der Ohe P, Liess M . Relative sensitivity distribution of aquatic invertebrates to organic and metal compounds. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004; 23(1):150-6. DOI: 10.1897/02-577. View

5.
Ginebreda A, Munoz I, de Alda M, Brix R, Lopez-Doval J, Barcelo D . Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals in rivers: relationships between hazard indexes and aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity indexes in the Llobregat River (NE Spain). Environ Int. 2009; 36(2):153-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.10.003. View