» Articles » PMID: 23593263

Do Contaminants Originating from State-of-the-art Treated Wastewater Impact the Ecological Quality of Surface Waters?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Apr 18
PMID 23593263
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since the 1980s, advances in wastewater treatment technology have led to considerably improved surface water quality in the urban areas of many high income countries. However, trace concentrations of organic wastewater-associated contaminants may still pose a key environmental hazard impairing the ecological quality of surface waters. To identify key impact factors, we analyzed the effects of a wide range of anthropogenic and environmental variables on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community. We assessed ecological water quality at 26 sampling sites in four urban German lowland river systems with a 0-100% load of state-of-the-art biological activated sludge treated wastewater. The chemical analysis suite comprised 12 organic contaminants (five phosphor organic flame retardants, two musk fragrances, bisphenol A, nonylphenol, octylphenol, diethyltoluamide, terbutryn), 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and 12 heavy metals. Non-metric multidimensional scaling identified organic contaminants that are mainly wastewater-associated (i.e., phosphor organic flame retardants, musk fragrances, and diethyltoluamide) as a major impact variable on macroinvertebrate species composition. The structural degradation of streams was also identified as a significant factor. Multiple linear regression models revealed a significant impact of organic contaminants on invertebrate populations, in particular on Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera species. Spearman rank correlation analyses confirmed wastewater-associated organic contaminants as the most significant variable negatively impacting the biodiversity of sensitive macroinvertebrate species. In addition to increased aquatic pollution with organic contaminants, a greater wastewater fraction was accompanied by a slight decrease in oxygen concentration and an increase in salinity. This study highlights the importance of reducing the wastewater-associated impact on surface waters. For aquatic ecosystems in urban areas this would lead to: (i) improvement of the ecological integrity, (ii) reduction of biodiversity loss, and (iii) faster achievement of objectives of legislative requirements, e.g., the European Water Framework Directive.

Citing Articles

Assessing the impact of two conventional wastewater treatment plants on small streams with effect-based methods.

Trejos Delgado C, Dombrowski A, Oehlmann J PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17326.

PMID: 39670086 PMC: 11636737. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17326.


Shift in diet composition of a riparian predator along a stream pollution gradient.

Huszarik M, Roodt A, Wernicke T, Link M, Lima-Fernandes E, Ahlen D Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2035):20242104.

PMID: 39561799 PMC: 11576108. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2104.


Treated tannery effluent and its impact on the receiving stream water: physicochemical characterization and cytogenotoxic evaluation using the Allium cepa test.

de Sousa A, Wilhelm C, da Silva C, Goldoni A, Rodrigues M, da Silva L Protoplasma. 2022; 260(3):949-954.

PMID: 36454318 DOI: 10.1007/s00709-022-01825-3.


What Works? the Influence of Changing Wastewater Treatment Type, Including Tertiary Granular Activated Charcoal, on Downstream Macroinvertebrate Biodiversity Over Time.

Johnson A, Jurgens M, Edwards F, Scarlett P, Vincent H, von der Ohe P Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019; 38(8):1820-1832.

PMID: 31063229 PMC: 6851886. DOI: 10.1002/etc.4460.


Environmental context and magnitude of disturbance influence trait-mediated community responses to wastewater in streams.

Burdon F, Reyes M, Alder A, Joss A, Ort C, Rasanen K Ecol Evol. 2016; 6(12):3923-39.

PMID: 27516855 PMC: 4972221. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2165.


References
1.
Stalter D, Magdeburg A, Wagner M, Oehlmann J . Ozonation and activated carbon treatment of sewage effluents: removal of endocrine activity and cytotoxicity. Water Res. 2010; 45(3):1015-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.10.008. View

2.
Daughton C, Ternes T . Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change?. Environ Health Perspect. 1999; 107 Suppl 6:907-38. PMC: 1566206. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.99107s6907. View

3.
Jobling S, Casey D, Rodgers-Gray T, Oehlmann J, Schulte-Oehlmann U, Pawlowski S . Comparative responses of molluscs and fish to environmental estrogens and an estrogenic effluent. Aquat Toxicol. 2003; 65(2):205-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-445x(03)00134-6. View

4.
Bundschuh M, Zubrod J, Schulz R . The functional and physiological status of Gammarus fossarum (Crustacea; Amphipoda) exposed to secondary treated wastewater. Environ Pollut. 2010; 159(1):244-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.08.030. View

5.
von der Ohe P, Liess M . Relative sensitivity distribution of aquatic invertebrates to organic and metal compounds. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004; 23(1):150-6. DOI: 10.1897/02-577. View