» Articles » PMID: 3105109

Factor VIII: C (FVIII: C) Recovery and Half-life After Infusion of Steam-treated High Purity Factor VIII Concentrate in Severe Hemophilia A--comparison of One-stage Assay, Two-stage Assay and a Chromogenic Substrate Assay

Overview
Journal Thromb Haemost
Publisher Thieme
Date 1986 Dec 15
PMID 3105109
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Factor VIII:C recovery and half-life was measured in 16 hemophilia A patients under comprehensively standardized conditions. Each patient received the same lot of a steam-treated high purity FVIII concentrate at a dose of 19-33 U/kg body weight. A comparison was made between the one-stage assay, the two-stage assay and a chromogenic substrate test for FVIII:C determination using a FXa-sensitive chromogenic substrate. Factor VIII:C potency of the administered FVIII concentrate was measured using calibration curves derived from a concentrate standard and FVIII:C plasma levels were read from calibration curves derived from a plasma standard. The chromogenic assay showed a good reproducibility at FVIII:C levels between 0.015 and 0.50 U/ml. The FVIII:C recoveries calculated from the results of the one-stage assay, the two-stage assay and the chromogenic substrate test were 109 +/- 20, 92 +/- 14 and 81 +/- 11% (mean +/- SD), respectively. The elimination half-lives of FVIII:C were calculated by non-linear least square analysis using a modified computerized Gauss-Newton algorithm. The half-lives calculated from the FVIII:C plasma levels measured by the one-stage assay, the two-stage assay and the chromogenic test were 23.8 +/- 6.4, 22.2 +/- 5.7 and 17.1 +/- 4.8 h (mean +/- SD), respectively. No previous study has reported such long half-life values. Our findings indicate that measurements of recoveries and half-lives by the chromogenic FVIII:C assay and by computerized non-linear least square analysis allow the possibility of individualized FVIII replacement therapy.

Citing Articles

Predictive performance of pharmacokinetic-guided prophylactic dosing of factor concentrates in hemophilia A and B.

Goedhart T, Bukkems L, Zwagemaker A, Coppens M, Fijnvandraat K, Schols S Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024; 8(3):102397.

PMID: 38689619 PMC: 11058079. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102397.


Administration of DDAVP did not improve the pharmacokinetics of FVIII concentrate in a clinically significant manner.

Loomans J, Stokhuijzen E, Peters M, Fijnvandraat K J Clin Transl Res. 2019; 3(Suppl 2):351-357.

PMID: 30873482 PMC: 6412613.


Intravascular recovery of VWF and FVIII following intraperitoneal injection and differences from intravenous and subcutaneous injection in mice.

Shi Q, Kuether E, Schroeder J, Fahs S, Montgomery R Haemophilia. 2012; 18(4):639-46.

PMID: 22221819 PMC: 3323668. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02735.x.


Pharmacokinetics of coagulation factors: clinical relevance for patients with haemophilia.

Bjorkman S, Berntorp E Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001; 40(11):815-32.

PMID: 11735604 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200140110-00003.


In vivo recovery and half-life time of a steam-treated factor IX concentrate in hemophilia B patients. The influence of reagents and standards.

Kohler M, Seifried E, Hellstern P, Pindur G, Miyashita C, Morsdorf S Blut. 1988; 57(6):341-5.

PMID: 3207891 DOI: 10.1007/BF00320754.