» Articles » PMID: 31050608

Patient Outcomes and Survival Following Surgery for Spinal Metastases

Overview
Date 2019 May 4
PMID 31050608
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: There is no consensus on the preferred treatment for patients with spinal metastases. Little is known about the outcomes of surgery for this population. The objectives of this paper are to examine the outcomes of surgery among patients with spinal metastases suffering from cord compression (CC) or intractable pain (IP). Retrospective, descriptive (level 4) case series. Rabin Medical Center, Israel. 61 patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis in a tertiary care hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: those with spinal CC and those with IP only. Surgery due to CC or IP among patients with spinal metastases. Frankel scale to assess neurological status, ambulatory and incontinence status, which were examined before surgery, at discharge and at last follow-up. Endpoints were death or latest follow-up visit. Survival and postoperative complications were documented. There was no significant difference in Frankel score before and after surgery among patients with CC (mean score 3.5 and 3.4 respectively, P = 0.62). Complete incontinence rates significantly increased in patients with CC between preoperative and last follow-up examinations (13.6% vs. 20%, respectively, P = 0.05). Median survival of CC and IP groups was 201 and 402 days, respectively (P = 0.32). Complication rate was 41.4%. In our cohort, Frankel score and walking capability of patients with CC did not change postoperatively, but continence status deteriorated over time. Surgeons should advise patients on expected surgical outcomes, especially in non-ambulatory and incontinent patients.

Citing Articles

Expected motor function change following decompressive surgery for spinal metastatic disease.

Okai B, Lipinski L, Ghannam M, Fabiano A N Am Spine Soc J. 2023; 15:100240.

PMID: 37457395 PMC: 10345847. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100240.


Robot and working tube-assisted invasion-controlled surgery for spinal metastases.

Zhou S, Li B, Wang P, Xu M, Zhao J, Duan S Front Surg. 2023; 10:1041562.

PMID: 36911610 PMC: 9998543. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1041562.

References
1.
Yamashita T, Aota Y, Kushida K, Murayama H, Hiruma T, Takeyama M . Changes in physical function after palliative surgery for metastatic spinal tumor: association of the revised Tokuhashi score with neurologic recovery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(21):2341-6. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181878733. View

2.
Sciubba D, Petteys R, Dekutoski M, Fisher C, Fehlings M, Ondra S . Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease. A review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 13(1):94-108. DOI: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09202. View

3.
Johnston F, Uttley D, Marsh H . Synchronous vertebral decompression and posterior stabilization in the treatment of spinal malignancy. Neurosurgery. 1989; 25(6):872-6. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-198912000-00004. View

4.
Ibrahim A, Crockard A, Antonietti P, Boriani S, Bunger C, Gasbarrini A . Does spinal surgery improve the quality of life for those with extradural (spinal) osseous metastases? An international multicenter prospective observational study of 223 patients. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of.... J Neurosurg Spine. 2008; 8(3):271-8. DOI: 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/3/271. View

5.
Choi D, Crockard A, Bunger C, Harms J, Kawahara N, Mazel C . Review of metastatic spine tumour classification and indications for surgery: the consensus statement of the Global Spine Tumour Study Group. Eur Spine J. 2009; 19(2):215-22. PMC: 2899817. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1252-x. View