» Articles » PMID: 16112300

Direct Decompressive Surgical Resection in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Compression Caused by Metastatic Cancer: a Randomised Trial

Overview
Journal Lancet
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2005 Aug 23
PMID 16112300
Citations 645
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The standard treatment for spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer is corticosteroids and radiotherapy. The role of surgery has not been established. We assessed the efficacy of direct decompressive surgery.

Methods: In this randomised, multi-institutional, non-blinded trial, we randomly assigned patients with spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer to either surgery followed by radiotherapy (n=50) or radiotherapy alone (n=51). Radiotherapy for both treatment groups was given in ten 3 Gy fractions. The primary endpoint was the ability to walk. Secondary endpoints were urinary continence, muscle strength and functional status, the need for corticosteroids and opioid analgesics, and survival time. All analyses were by intention to treat.

Findings: After an interim analysis the study was stopped because the criterion of a predetermined early stopping rule was met. Thus, 123 patients were assessed for eligibility before the study closed and 101 were randomised. Significantly more patients in the surgery group (42/50, 84%) than in the radiotherapy group (29/51, 57%) were able to walk after treatment (odds ratio 6.2 [95% CI 2.0-19.8] p=0.001). Patients treated with surgery also retained the ability to walk significantly longer than did those with radiotherapy alone (median 122 days vs 13 days, p=0.003). 32 patients entered the study unable to walk; significantly more patients in the surgery group regained the ability to walk than patients in the radiation group (10/16 [62%] vs 3/16 [19%], p=0.01). The need for corticosteroids and opioid analgesics was significantly reduced in the surgical group.

Interpretation: Direct decompressive surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy is superior to treatment with radiotherapy alone for patients with spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer.

Citing Articles

Bone mineral density as potential individual prognostic biomarker in patients with neurosurgically treated spinal metastasis.

Asoglu H, Lampmann T, Jaber M, Khalafov L, Dittmer J, Ilic I J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025; 151(3):105.

PMID: 40064706 PMC: 11893684. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-025-06142-9.


Outcome of spine surgery in the context of spinal metastatic disease: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Yakdan S, Herrera M, Wehbe N, Akoum M, Kaleem M, Ruiz-Cardozo M J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2025; 15(4):499-505.

PMID: 40061190 PMC: 11888037. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_158_24.


Incidence of and survival after surgery for metastatic spine disease: a nationwide register-based study between 1997 and 2020 from Finland.

Toivonen L, Ponkilainen V, Repo J, Mattila V Acta Orthop. 2025; 96:250-255.

PMID: 40059767 PMC: 11894730. DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43264.


Use of Carbon Fiber Implants to Improve the Safety and Efficacy of Radiation Therapy for Spine Tumor Patients.

Lam F, Guru S, AbuReesh D, Hori Y, Chuang C, Liu L Brain Sci. 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40002531 PMC: 11852773. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15020199.


Patterns of Treatment Delay in Patients with Symptomatic Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression.

Wang S, Hallinan J, Tan C, Chua K, Teo A, Kumar N Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40002190 PMC: 11852822. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040595.