» Articles » PMID: 3104906

Evolution of Accelerated Senescence in Laboratory Populations of Drosophila

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 1987 Apr 1
PMID 3104906
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ecological theories of life history evolution predict that natural selection should favor semelparous life histories in environments where juvenile survival is high relative to adult survival and rates of population growth are high. That is, organisms should complete their entire reproductive effort in a short period of time following maturation. Direct empirical verification of this idea has been lacking. Six independent populations of Drosophila melanogaster were maintained in two different environments, called r and K, for more than 120 generations. In the r environment population size was small, larval survival and rates of population growth were high, and reproduction was limited to a few days after eclosion. In the K environment population size was large and larval survival low, but adults were allowed to reproduce indefinitely. The fecundity of females of different sizes from each environment was measured daily for 4 weeks. No differences in fecundity were seen during the first week of adult life for females from the two environments. By the fourth week, however, the fecundity of large females from the r environment was 47-83% less than that of females from the K environment. The accelerated senescence exhibited by females from the r environment appears to be due to the accumulation of deleterious alleles whose effects are expressed late in life, which is consistent with the mutation accumulation hypothesis for the evolution of senescence.

Citing Articles

Genetic, Environmental, and Stochastic Components of Lifespan Variability: The Paradigm.

Bylino O, Ogienko A, Batin M, Georgiev P, Omelina E Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(8).

PMID: 38674068 PMC: 11050664. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25084482.


Translational Geroscience: From invertebrate models to companion animal and human interventions.

Lee M, Kaeberlein M Transl Med Aging. 2020; 2:15-29.

PMID: 32368707 PMC: 7198054. DOI: 10.1016/j.tma.2018.08.002.


Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in .

Flatt T Genetics. 2020; 214(1):3-48.

PMID: 31907300 PMC: 6944413. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.300160.


Regulation of Drosophila Lifespan by bellwether Promoter Alleles.

Garcia J, Carbone M, Mackay T, Anholt R Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):4109.

PMID: 28646164 PMC: 5482829. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04530-x.


Expression of genetic and environmental variation during ageing : 2. Selection for increased lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster.

Engstrom G, Liljedahl L, Bjorklund T Theor Appl Genet. 2013; 85(1):26-32.

PMID: 24197225 DOI: 10.1007/BF00223841.


References
1.
Kosuda K . The aging effect on male mating activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 1985; 15(3):297-303. DOI: 10.1007/BF01065984. View

2.
Cole L . The population consequences of life history phenomena. Q Rev Biol. 1954; 29(2):103-37. DOI: 10.1086/400074. View

3.
Mueller L, Ayala F . Trade-off between r-selection and K-selection in Drosophila populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981; 78(2):1303-5. PMC: 319997. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1303. View

4.
EDNEY E, Gill R . Evolution of senescence and specific longevity. Nature. 1968; 220(5164):281-2. DOI: 10.1038/220281a0. View

5.
Rose M, Charlesworth B . Genetics of life history in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sib analysis of adult females. Genetics. 1981; 97(1):173-86. PMC: 1214382. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/97.1.173. View