» Articles » PMID: 31040314

Assessing Neural Responses Towards Objectified Human Targets and Objects to Identify Processes of Sexual Objectification That Go Beyond the Metaphor

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 May 2
PMID 31040314
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectification - reducing a someone to a something - represents a powerful and potentially damaging way in which we can see and treat others. Women are often victims of processes of objectification that occur whenever a woman is reduced to her body or certain body parts. What remains unclear is the extent to which a woman becomes an object when objectified. Using the oddball paradigm in three experiments, participants' neural activity was measured while they analyzed frequently presented male and female human stimuli and infrequently presented gender-matched doll-like objects. The infrequent doll-like objects were expected to trigger a late event-related neurophysiological response (P300) the more they were perceived different from the repeated, human stimuli (i.e., the oddball effect). In Experiment 1, the oddball effect was significantly smaller for objectified women compared to objectified men. Results of Experiment 2 confirmed that this effect was confined to objectified depictions of women. In Experiment 3, no semantic references to the human-object divide were provided, but objectified women were still perceived more similar to real objects. Taken together, these results are the first to demonstrate that the perception of women, when objectified, changes in essence beyond the metaphor.

Citing Articles

The role of objectification in young men's perpetration of intimate partner violence.

Saenz A, Haslam N PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313016.

PMID: 39514590 PMC: 11548787. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313016.


Electrophysiological, emotional and behavioural responses of female targets of sexual objectification.

Monachesi B, Deruti A, Grecucci A, Vaes J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):5777.

PMID: 37031255 PMC: 10082788. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32379-w.


Direct and Indirect Roles of Men in Determining Women Decision to Use Laser Procedures for Skin Care.

Teresa A Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023; 16:617-633.

PMID: 36936751 PMC: 10019343. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S398685.


Preliminary Evidence of EEG Connectivity Changes during Self-Objectification of Workers.

Angulo-Sherman I, Saavedra-Hernandez A, Urbina-Arias N, Hernandez-Granados Z, Sainz M Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(20).

PMID: 36298257 PMC: 9606942. DOI: 10.3390/s22207906.


The Sexual OBjectification and EMotion database: A free stimulus set and norming data of sexually objectified and non-objectified female targets expressing multiple emotions.

Ruzzante D, Monachesi B, Orabona N, Vaes J Behav Res Methods. 2021; 54(2):541-555.

PMID: 34291433 PMC: 9046321. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01640-3.


References
1.
Cogoni C, Carnaghi A, Mitrovic A, Leder H, Fantoni C, Silani G . Understanding the mechanisms behind the sexualized-body inversion hypothesis: The role of asymmetry and attention biases. PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0193944. PMC: 5886406. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193944. View

2.
Picton T . The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 9(4):456-79. DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199210000-00002. View

3.
Jost K, Bryck R, Vogel E, Mayr U . Are old adults just like low working memory young adults? Filtering efficiency and age differences in visual working memory. Cereb Cortex. 2010; 21(5):1147-54. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhq185. View

4.
Waytz A, Morewedge C, Epley N, Monteleone G, Gao J, Cacioppo J . Making sense by making sentient: effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 99(3):410-35. DOI: 10.1037/a0020240. View

5.
Amon M . Visual attention in mixed-gender groups. Front Psychol. 2015; 5:1569. PMC: 4290473. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01569. View