Perception Isn't So Simple: Commentary on Bernard, Gervais, Allen, Campomizzi, and Klein (2012)

Overview

Journal Psychol Sci

Specialty Psychology

Date 2013 Apr 20

PMID 23599305

Citations 9

Authors

Michael J Tarr

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Making heads or tails of body inversion effects: Do heads matter?.

Axelsson E, Buddhadasa T, Manca L, Robbins R PLoS One. 2022; 17(2):e0263902.

PMID: 35176071 PMC: 8853516. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263902.

The Sexual OBjectification and EMotion database: A free stimulus set and norming data of sexually objectified and non-objectified female targets expressing multiple emotions.

Ruzzante D, Monachesi B, Orabona N, Vaes J Behav Res Methods. 2021; 54(2):541-555.

PMID: 34291433 PMC: 9046321. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01640-3.

Measuring objectification through the Body Inversion Paradigm: Methodological issues.

Zogmaister C, Durante F, Mari S, Crippa F, Volpato C PLoS One. 2020; 15(2):e0229161.

PMID: 32074127 PMC: 7031944. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229161.

Assessing neural responses towards objectified human targets and objects to identify processes of sexual objectification that go beyond the metaphor.

Vaes J, Cristoforetti G, Ruzzante D, Cogoni C, Mazza V Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):6699.

PMID: 31040314 PMC: 6491438. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42928-x.

The Relationship Between Social Power and Sexual Objectification: Behavioral and ERP Data.

Xiao L, Li B, Zheng L, Wang F Front Psychol. 2019; 10:57.

PMID: 30740077 PMC: 6355676. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00057.

References

HAYWARD W, Tarr M . Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997; 23(5):1511-21. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.5.1511. View

Bertamini M, Munafo M . Bite-Size Science and Its Undesired Side Effects. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 7(1):67-71. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611429353. View

Folk M, Luce R . Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987; 13(3):395-404. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.3.395. View

Tarr M, Pinker S . Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cogn Psychol. 1989; 21(2):233-82. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90009-1. View

HAYWARD W, Tarr M . Differing views on views: comments on Biederman and Bar (1999). Vision Res. 2000; 40(28):3895-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00179-6. View

Bernard P, Gervais S, Allen J, Campomizzi S, Klein O . Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: the sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychol Sci. 2012; 23(5):469-71. DOI: 10.1177/0956797611434748. View

Gauthier I, Behrmann M, Tarr M . Can face recognition really be dissociated from object recognition?. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999; 11(4):349-70. DOI: 10.1162/089892999563472. View

Ledgerwood A, Sherman J . Short, Sweet, and Problematic? The Rise of the Short Report in Psychological Science. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 7(1):60-6. DOI: 10.1177/1745691611427304. View

Rossion B . Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008; 128(2):274-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003. View

10.

Lawson R, Humphreys G . View specificity in object processing: evidence from picture matching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996; 22(2):395-416. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.2.395. View

11.

Jolicoeur P, Milliken B . Identification of disoriented objects: effects of context of prior presentation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989; 15(2):200-10. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.2.200. View

12.

Biederman I, Bar M . One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Res. 1999; 39(17):2885-99. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00309-5. View